• Tyfud@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    3 months ago

    I presume, like everything else wrong with Capitalism, it comes down to cost. It’s more cost efficient somehow. I don’t understand the details, because I’m not a chicken farmer, but I have been in the capitalism machine for a long, long time, and I’d bet a shitton of tax payer money that it’s purely down to cost.

    If it saves $0.02 per chicken, they’ll gladly poison the rivers, oceans, lakes, etc. with refuse and baby chick corpses.

    • ephemeral_gibbon
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      3 months ago

      In this case it’s because if you raised them no-one would want to buy them. The egg laying breeds are a lot tougher and have a lot less meet than the ones bred for meat. They also cost more per amount of meat in the end.

      The simple fact is that people don’t want to buy that, so it’d just be wasteful to grow them out.

        • ephemeral_gibbon
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          Not mostly, mostly consumer preferences. You wouldn’t be able to sell them and it’d just be wasteful

      • John_McMurray@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        That’s a lie. Old chickens are tough, usually only egg laying breeds get old. “Egg laying” varieties are not tough at basic maturity. Taste better too, than the commercial meat breeds. I’m specifically getting chicken wings from egg laying breeds because the skin is thicker and crisps up better than fast growth meat breeds (run a bar)