Is there really a reason, for example, for there to be the distinction of “magazine” and “community”? When you’re federating, the same features should be called the same, if close enough. That way everyone can talk with everyone about stuff and we all immediately understand each other.

Would also alleviate confusion for any new adopters.

^I’m pretty sure this is going to be impossible though, since each sides egos will likely get in the way :D^

  • 0x1C3B00DA@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Language change doesn’t have to result from a “need” for a new word. It can happen just because ppl choose to use a different word. And the developer of kbin is a Polish speaker. Maybe he chose “magazine” because the Polish word makes more sense to him than “community” (I know about the rifle pun. Wordplay works even better when there are multiple meanings)

    Either way, my point is we currently have at least 4 words to describe these things (group, community, magazine, sublemmy). Users will coalesce on one or learn that they’re all synonymous and won’t even notice when someone uses a different term than they use

    • GunnarRunnar@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah, language can be changed by a (conscious?) design decision. But whether that change is necessary is up to debate and just because you could doesn’t mean you should.

      Some users will learn the terms and some won’t but what I mean is that it’s a hindrance either way. And defense isn’t “that’s language” the defense is “that’s my design vision”.