• ChihuahuaOfDoom@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    75
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    I might catch hate for this but I never understood why it wasn’t automatic the entire time since it’s illegal to not register.

      • disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        Not any more at least. Prior to this bill, failing to register for Selective Services was a felony punishable by imprisonment for up to five years and/or a fine of not more than $250,000.

        Now you’re automatically enrolled. I think it’s actually better this way.

        • InternetUser2012@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          5 months ago

          Eh, military service now is 8 years right? I’d take jail and file bankruptcy. At least you’ll be alive instead of cannon fodder, and it’s 3 years less.

          • disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            5 months ago

            We were always forced to register. The fine and imprisonment were penalties for avoiding registration. You’d be registered at the hearing as well as facing consequences.

              • FutileRecipe@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                5 months ago

                if they draft it’s because cannon fodder is needed.

                That’s a big if, as you noted US hasn’t drafted in forever. But even if they did draft, the US hasn’t used “cannon fodder” tactics for several decades. Their technology is so advanced (and military budget/spending so high) they don’t need to in order to win. Trench warfare ain’t really a thing anymore.

    • homura1650@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      Because there has not been a draft since the 70s, where automatic registration was not feasible.

    • TAG@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      5 months ago

      It was not automatic so rich people can avoid it. I have never heard of someone facing criminal charges for failing to register. I have heard that failing to register can impact eligibility for college financial aid and scholarships.

      • afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        5 months ago

        I have heard that failing to register can impact eligibility for college financial aid and scholarships.

        And this is why I hate the fucking neoliberals so much. As bad as the conservatives are they don’t expect me to agree with them, they just want my money. Neoliberalism demands that you not only pay a shit ton of money for student loan debt that you also internalize that you deserve to because you were privileged. They have developed economic original sin

    • shalafi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 months ago

      It should be automatic, and it is now. Why did I have to worry about it 40-years ago? Now? Now worries, done deal. Nothing has changed.

      Of course lemmy thinks that serving means you’re on the front lines as a grunt with an M4.

      • MindTraveller@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        Might as well be. Giving a gun to a murderer is as bad as pulling the trigger, and that’s what supply officers do. Mechanics fix killing machines. Cooks feed killers while they’re off killing. The military is a machine, and every cog in that machine is a murderer.

    • disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      5 months ago

      Automatic registration for Selective Services, not automatic draft. That’s very different. This is actually helpful in keeping people out of prison or getting fined for not registering.

      But yes, this absolutely proves that they could automatically register people to vote with no designated party affiliation.

      • schnurrito@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        5 months ago

        As a European I have always been confused when Americans talk about “voter registration”. The way it works in my country is you are legally required to register your residence with the government and that registration is automatically used to determine a voter registry (just filtering by age, citizenship and exclusion due to criminal convictions all of which is information already known to the government). I always just get a letter a few weeks before elections informing me where my polling place is.

        • jubilationtcornpone@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          5 months ago

          Well you see, in the United States, the way some politicians, specifically ones belonging to a certain very authoritarian political party manage to get elected is by making sure people don’t or can’t vote.

          This is often coupled with throwing a huge hissy fit about “voter fraud” which doesn’t actually exist on any remotely meaningful level.

          • uis@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            5 months ago

            Well, voting fraud is a thing in Russia. Stuffing when one person throws multiple ballots at once, carousel when one persion votes one multiple stations, dead souls(reference to Gogol) where dead or absent people vote and Venedictov’s box - when Sobyanin repeatedly claims that electronic voting results will come immidiately when voting ends, but don’t long after all physical stations reported results.

            • AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              5 months ago

              Comparing Russian elections to US elections may as well be comparing Vichy France elections to US elections. They are quite different beasts.

              • uis@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                5 months ago

                Maybe, but I am more familiar Russian elections. Personal experience.

                Also important note: election fraud != voting fraud. Voting fraud is just one type of election fraud. In Russia most widespread type of election fraud is not registering candidates.

                • AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  5 months ago

                  Registering candidates in the US doesn’t matter, I could run for president or any other office and no one would reject my application to be on the ballot, unless I didn’t have enough signatures.

                  I would be surprised if you’ve ever heard of Vermin Supreme, or any of the other third party candidates for US president, much less the lower offices.

                  https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vermin_Supreme

        • lud@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          5 months ago

          Btw it’s insane to exclude people in a supposed democracy based on criminal convictions.

            • lud@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              5 months ago

              It seems that they exclude people wherever the commenter lives too.

              • schnurrito@discuss.tchncs.de
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                5 months ago

                Can exclude, not all of them do, I think it has to be a specific part of the sentence (ie not automatic) because some high court ruled that some years ago.

                • lud@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  5 months ago

                  Can exclude, not all of them do Who are “them”?

                  Who is excluding people where you live and why can they do that? Isn’t it handled centrally by a single governmental body?

        • redisdead@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 months ago

          In France you have to register to vote as well. It takes about a minute and you can do it online or at the town hall

        • uis@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          Yep. Same. You just go get stamp in passport once, then you just go to voting station with passport. That’s it. Oh, also by default(when you get passport) you get stamp that you live where you lived during filing.

    • Rob T Firefly@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      Just because the politicians want to grab you out of your life and use you as cannon fodder doesn’t mean they want to actually be as accountable to you as they’re supposed to.

  • mctoasterson@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    42
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    5 months ago

    You’re already legally required to manually register with the selective service if you are male and you turn 18.

    Why not just introduce legislation to end that requirement altogether.

  • njm1314@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    39
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    5 months ago

    Seems like a pretty good Common Sense legislation really. You already have to register by law so making it automatic would be easier for all of us and avoid anyone getting in trouble for something stupid. I don’t see a downside to this. I would like to see it apply to voting registration too however.

      • umbraroze@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        5 months ago

        Well, voting registration as it’s implemented in America isn’t exactly in vogue. As in “oh, you just need to get an ID to vote from now on.” And people without ID need to do some extra paperwork and the office is open 5 minutes every other week, just go through the door located behind the acid moat and bear traps.

        Over here in Finland: Government has a comprehensive record of citizens, they know where everyone lives and who’s eligible to vote. So they send you a letter. “Here’s how to do the advance voting, here’s the polling location you need to go to on election day, Also here’s how to draw the numbers, so this will be less confusing. Just bring this notice card with you. And an ID. If you don’t have an ID, visit the police station and they’ll give you one for free.”

        • sparkle@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          Cymraeg
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          In Italy, you have to travel to whatever city you have residence in to vote. A lot of (mostly progressive) people have to fly across the country to cast their vote, apparently it sucks for them

  • dhork@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    Some folks inherit star-spangled eyes

    Ooh, they send you down to war, Lord

    And when you ask 'em, “How much should we give?”

    Ooh, they only answer, “More! More! More!” Yo

    • totallynotaspy@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      5 months ago

      Idk about your state, but mine basically forces you to register for the selective services to even get a license/learner’s permit

      § 46.2-221.1. Registration with Selective Service required for issuance of learner’s permits, driver’s licenses, commercial driver’s licenses, and special identification cards to certain applicants.

      A. Every male applicant for a learner’s permit, driver’s license, commercial driver’s license, special identification card, or renewal of any such permit, license, or card who is less than twenty-six years old and is either a citizen of the United States or an immigrant shall, at the time of his application, be registered in compliance with the requirement of section 3 of the Military Selective Service Act, 50 U.S.C. § 3801 et seq

    • Aviandelight @lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      I’m not male but I did register for the draft when I turned 18. I remember doing it on my taxes as weird as that sounds.

  • FiniteBanjo@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    Technically, the USA already required you to sign up for the draft right around the time you received your Social Security Card. The draft has not been used since 1973 and earlier. So this basically has no adverse effect. Even if a draft happened all the same people who would have been drafted before will be drafted now.

    • Evilcoleslaw@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      You’re required to sign up within 30 days of your 18th birthday. You should have (well your parents anyway) a social security card within the first year of your life, strange outliers aside.

      It’s still technically a crime knowingly not registering, with a $250k fine, even if it hasn’t been prosecuted in decades.

      It also bars you from federal government jobs, many federal programs, and grants. Until 2020, it also barred any federal financial aid for education, but that’s changed now.

      • FiniteBanjo@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        11
        ·
        5 months ago

        You should have a Social Security Number when you are born as a citizen of the USA. You register for your card when you turn 18.

        • dezmd@lemmy.worldM
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          5 months ago

          Your parents received your ss card after you were born once your SSN was assigned.

          You register for the draft when you register to vote.

        • Ookami38@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          I’ve definitely had my social security card since I was like, 12. Before that, my mom had it. Definitely, 100% did not get it at or around 18

    • HexadecimalSky@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      American men are supposed to sign up for the draft when they turn 18, this new bill would make that an automatic process.

        • HexadecimalSky@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          Yes, it’s called the selective service, but it’s colloquially known as draft and that’s what above was referencing

        • FiniteBanjo@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          I like how you got downvoted for rehashing 16bit when all they did was repeat exactly the same thing me and the article headline said and still got upvotes.

    • intensely_human@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      5 months ago

      The draft has not been used since 1973 and earlier

      One thing I found as I’ve gotten older is that history gets shorter and shorter the older you get.

      1973 was so recent bro you have no idea. It was within one human lifetime. That’s really close. That basically just happened.

      • FiniteBanjo@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        Defending only yourself isn’t right, especially when you want all the benefits with none of the costs.

          • FiniteBanjo@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            5 months ago

            Again, there hasn’t been a draft in 51 years, all of our current armed forces are volunteers and about a fifth of them are women. If you want to extend the draft that is fine but it sounded more like you were opposed to the draft entirely.

  • assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    5 months ago

    For one, I think this was already required. I remember having to enroll in selective service.

    For two though, whoever calls another draft is dead in the water. It’s commonly accepted that starting an actual draft is political suicide.

    That said, it would be nice if we could codify that and ban the draft.

    • Cethin@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      5 months ago

      Yeah, honestly as long as we aren’t willing to change things in a meaningful way, this is somewhat nice. It’s like voter registration. It should be automatic (assuming it’s required anyway). Sadly we are more likely to make draft registration automatic before voter registration.

    • Maggoty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      5 months ago

      Anything that actually required a draft would result in a nuclear exchange before the draft could be called.

      • assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        5 months ago

        If there is a legitimate reason for a draft, a draft may not be necessary anyway. Unless the enemy is offering a peaceful arrangement to everyone they meet, or there’s no way to get your family to safety, I think most people would willingly fight.

    • Got_Bent@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      5 months ago

      I wouldn’t put it past the Republican party to bring conscription to the table. Probably with all kinds of exceptions and loopholes to either keep their own kids out of it entirely or guarantee cush domestic desk jobs to show how patriotic they are. Everybody else gets to line up with a rifle.

    • LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 months ago

      You are required to sign up but they usually only can enforce it in ways such as applying for a driver’s license or voter registration. Maybe more kids aren’t applying for drivers licenses and therefore aren’t signing up.

      • ValenThyme@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        if you never sign up you’re excluded from a number of government jobs such as at the post office.

          • Drivebyhaiku@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            5 months ago

            It’s bonkers that you have to actively sign up for it. Canada had conscription on the books as an available tool but like… you never actively signed on or were penalized for not doing that paperwork. In 2021 they ended all mandatory military service and two months ago they removed conscription entirely. Not that it’s possible for conscription to not come back as technically it’s not actively banned, but if it did it would have to be written and implemented as law entirely from scratch and be re subject to the full process of new constitutional challenge and could now be subject to gender discriminations to strictly men as required by current civil rights .

            There’s something about coercing someone to sign their name to paper to register for conscription that feels wrong to me that just accepting a call to conscription doesn’t. Like they want to reduce your resistance to it by making it “voluntary”.

            • LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              5 months ago

              Many people don’t pay attention. My mother (63) didn’t know me or my brother were egistered when a conversation came up about it last year. Most people are so complacent in accepting every day life because they are worried about living day by day. The concept that a mother who is legally responsible for 2 kids didn’t know they both signed themselves to serve in the military at 16 is baffling from a stand back and look at it mentality. (Only two kids, both sign to give their life away while her and her husban(my father) are the only ones who legally could sign our lives away at that age.)

        • Evilcoleslaw@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          That was apparently repealed in 2020.

          Wish it would’ve happened sooner. There was some issue with my school’s financial aid office every freaking semester. A week before classes started, I would get a letter that all my financial aid was canceled for failing to register, and I’d have to go in and prove I had. After the 4th time, they finally took a photocopy of my registration and had me sign an affidavit and appended it to my file.

          • jake_jake_jake_@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            5 months ago

            i did not know that, thank you for letting me know, it’s good that they repealed that, for my area it wouldn’t have made a difference for myself registering as our high school had all of the males do it as part of a civics class.

      • piecat@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        I had to apply at the post office. I’m pretty sure there was a penalty if I didn’t, like a fine or jail

        • Evilcoleslaw@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          $250k fine, but they haven’t prosecuted anyone since the 80s, and even then, it was only a handful and typically only when the person went around bragging about it in protest.

          The bigger deal is being barred from federal employment, contracts, grants, and other programs. Some states may deny drivers licenses because of it. And it used to mean you couldn’t receive federal financial aid for college, but that changed in 2020.

  • intensely_human@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    That would be nice. It is rather demeaning to sign a paper promising to die for your country when needed, in order to get voting privileges.

  • SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    5 months ago

    Kinda a nothing burger really. The military doesn’t want conscripts unless there’s an existential threat to the country.

    So there’s two scenarios:

    1. Selective service continues to exist and is only used if there’s an existential threat to the country
    2. Selective service is eliminated and is re-instated only if there’s an existential threat to the country

    Option 2 is preferable since it eliminates the cost of a program that will likely never be used again. But it still doesn’t eliminate the possibility of a draft since if the country were under an existential threat in the future, legislation can be passed to bring it back. So Option 2 isn’t effectively different from Option 1, other than the cost savings.

    As it is, selective service is basically just a political talking point, and a way to “own the libs” or whatever. The best way to argue against it is to make an argument around the cost of a program that doesn’t really accomplish anything. But the libs take the bait and argue about not wanting to be drafted, which isn’t wrong, but that makes the libs look weak in the eyes of many, and it allows Republicans get to make hay about their opposition being weak.

  • AnIndefiniteArticle@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    5 months ago

    I was given a draft card with my financial aid package for undergrad.

    Applying for FAFSA was a required part of the application process for public universities and most private ones, meaning that nearly all amabs applying for college were automatically enrolled by this process…

    until they simplified FAFSA in 2020, which I just learned about when acquiring the link above as a citation.

    This bill would reinstate and expand automatic enrollment to amabs who don’t need FAFSA or who don’t want to go to college.

    So they are trying to change the conditions for automatic enrollment from “has a penis and wants to go to college” (precovid) to just “has a penis”.