• barsquid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    5 months ago

    Cross reference the states the conservative cutouts are winning in the primaries with whether or not they are swing states and number of EC votes, then get back to us. In 2016, Hillary had more votes in AZ, NV, FL, OH. What do you want to happen for that shit, bank it on states like WV (+42 R) suddenly flipping blue?

    Because there isn’t an overwhelming swarm of people voting for anyone who isn’t Repub, the Dems have to chase the reliable voters, who are more conservative.

    It is the voters who are wrong, by staying home election after election or throwing their votes in the trash instead of pushing against the sliding window.

    I don’t like the Dem choices but IDK what the fuck else they are supposed to do once the primaries start. Running the candidate who wins with Dem voters in swing states makes sense as a strategy.

    • Maggoty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      Arizona is not a blue dog state. There is a large gap between a mostly progressive democrat party and a batshit insane republican party.

      And it might also have to do with Idaho and South Carolina going first, with everyone else dropping out before super tuesday even happens. Most of the states don’t even get a real choice.

      • barsquid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        I hate how the primaries do that. That is indeed bullshit. That sets up momentum for the rest of the primaries and they aren’t really swing states. So stupid. All primaries should be on the same day.

        While I’m wishing for voting in this country that isn’t dumb as hell: let’s do no primaries at all and STAR voting in the general.