• Burstar@lemmy.dbzer0.comOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    13 days ago

    First, the bump to 66% only happens after 250k that year so $25k would not trigger the extra 16% eligibility. So standard 50% CG only would be applied. $12.5k taxed at your rate means the min rate which may be something like 20% (this number is a wild guess) so say $2500 paid to the gov. Not as bad as it sounds.

    • ryper@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      13 days ago

      Don’t forget that the $25k wouldn’t all be gains in the first place. If the investment had increased in value by 25%, it would be 20k base and only 5k gains; if it had increased by 100% it would be an even split. We’re talking about taxing a part of a part of the sale value.

      • MacroCyclo@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        12 days ago

        Once you get this far down the thread you realize how complicated it actually is and why most people have no sweet clue how it works.

    • Bye@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      13 days ago

      Thanks for the info, that makes perfect sense. Seems like a good idea to tax people making tons and tons of money at a high rate then!

      • Burstar@lemmy.dbzer0.comOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        13 days ago

        IF it was forced to be in the 66% CG bracket $16.5k would be taxed at the previously posited 20% resulting in $3300 paid to government so it is a respectable jump in tax owed for those being subjected to it.

    • Burstar@lemmy.dbzer0.comOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      13 days ago

      A better way to think of it is <$250k 50% of the profit is tax-free. >$250k only 34% of it is tax exempt.