With more and more alternatives appearing to Lego which also increase in variety and even surpass at times Lego quality, why focus just on this company for a brick building community? I for example have been badly burned by Lego’s handling of the Mindstorms brand and there are more compatibility broken product lines from Lego.

Is posting other brands alright here? Will it lead to unpleasant conflicts from Lego, if their brand name is used?

  • Lux@lemmy.world
    shield
    M
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Offbrand bricks are just fine. The reason I picked the Lego name is because everyone knows it. So no worries! If you want to make a specific community for offbrand bricks, I’d be glad to pin it!

    • hikaru755@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I think this was the right call, discoverability is just so much better than any recombination of “interlocking building bricks” or something. “Lego” is very close to being a generic category name anyway, in my opinion. As long as the community is as small over here as it is right now, splintering it even further wouldn’t be a wise move, I think.

    • MrFloppy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Offbrand bricks are just fine. The reason I picked the Lego name is because everyone knows it.

      Would be great, if you could write this in the rules-box.

    • c2h6@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      That’s a good decision I think. Calling it lego because it’s the most famous brand, but allowing anything that’s compatible.

      Not sure if this is going to be an issue in future, but there are also building blocks that use a non compatible system like nanoblocks. At some point you might have to decide if those are acceptable too!