• just_another_person@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    edit-2
    19 days ago

    VNC is a bit dated, doesn’t support auth as part of the protocol, and doesn’t functionally support a lot things like dynamic screen resizing, and things like stream transport of audio.

    Not saying RDP is necessarily better, but it is functionally faster at least, and implementations here are open source, not the closed MS version.

    • GreyBeard@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      19 days ago

      VNC might have seen improvements over the years, but last time tried it, it didn’t handle high resolution/detail well at all. RDP can stream practically any media in close to real time, as to where VNC really broke down if you tried to change too much of the screen at once. Ideally, there’d probably be a new open screen sharing standard that used modern encoding and decoding to allow for high bandwidth connections smoothly. Moonlight gets close, but isn’t really designed as an RDP/VNC replacement.

      • just_another_person@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        19 days ago

        It’s really just a codec issue at that point though. They COULD revamp, but why when you can just improve and make a new protocol.

      • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        18 days ago

        In my experience moonlight is only really useful for playing games on a very fast connection. RDP on the other hand works well from even they worse connections

        • GreyBeard@lemmy.one
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          18 days ago

          For sure, that’s what it is designed for. A proper remote desktop system would need to be able to support low bandwidth links and gracefully drop frames if latency is high or bandwidth is low.