Rational beliefs should be able to withstand scrutiny and opposing arguments. The inability to do so indicates that the belief is more about personal bias and emotional investment rather than objective analysis.

  • Thorny_Insight@lemm.eeOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    5 months ago

    I posted it below already

    Counter-argument for this would be that some deeply held ethical convictions might be difficult to argue against because they are based on fundamental values that many consider non-negotiable. These beliefs can be rational, yet difficult to counter without feeling a profound moral dissonance. “Don’t litter” would be a good example that’s really difficult to honestly argue against.

    • Dasus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      I believe gravity is real.

      I just can’t come up with a sincere counter-argument.

      I must be extremely biased and emotional.