So, Iā€™m kinda new to this Lemmy thingy and the fediverse. I like the fediverse from a technological standpoint. However, I think that, if we gain more and more traction, Lemmy (and by extend the entire fediverse) is a GDPR clusterfuck waiting to happen. With big and expensive repercussionsā€¦

Why? Well, according to GDPR, all personal data from EU users must remain in the EU. And personal data goes really far. Even an IP-address is personal data. An e-mail address is personal data. I donā€™t think there is jurisprudence regarding usernames, so that might be up for discussion.

Since the entire goal of the fediverse is ā€œtransportingā€ all data to all servers inside the ActivityPub/fediverse world, the data of a EU member will be transported all over the place. Resulting in a giant GDPR breach. And I have no idea who will be held responsibleā€¦ The people hosting an instance? The developers of Lemmy? The developers of ActivityPub?

Large corporations are getting hefty fines for GDPR breaches. And since Lemmy is growing, Lemmy might be ā€œin the spotlightsā€ in the upcoming years.

I donā€™t like GDPR, and Iā€™m all for the technological setup of the fediverse. However, I definitely can see a ā€œcompetitorā€ (that is currently very large but loosing ground quickly) having a clear eye out to eliminate the competitionā€¦

What do yā€™all thing about this?

  • sab@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    Ā·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Iā€™m not an expert in GDPR and will leave the technical side to those who are, but the fact that the EU actively present at the Fediverse with among others the @EU_Commission represented at their official Mastodon instance, I would be surprised if the GDPR was suddenly weaponised against it.

    GDPR was written with the intention of empowering users over corporations. The Fediverse has the same goal.

  • apfel@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    Ā·
    1 year ago

    ā€œdonā€™t like GDPRā€? Whatā€™s not to like? Best thing that came out of EU regulation in a long time. And as others have noted you seem to be misinformed about what it actually saysā€¦

    • BrokebackHampton@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      Ā·
      1 year ago

      I also canā€™t wrap my head around ā€œnot likingā€ GDPR

      As a relevant example, seems like only citizens covered by GDPR will be able to request Reddit to remove all of their data from Redditā€™s servers since comment deleting tools and scripts are being bypassed, with loads of comments and even entire profiles getting restored by Reddit admins

    • infamousbelgian@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      Ā·
      1 year ago

      Can you explain where Iā€™m misinformed? I can surely be misinformed about the workings of Lemmy. However, for GDPR you will not ā€œwinā€ it with a simple TOS or something like that.

      If even Google canā€™t make their Workplace to follow rules in such a way that Workplace can be used according to the AVG rules in the Belgian (well, Flemish) schools, Iā€™m pretty sure that just saying ā€œitā€™s in the TOSā€ is not enoughā€¦

      But again, no expert so I hope that I am wrong.

  • sunaurus@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    Ā·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    And personal data goes really far. Even an IP-address is personal data. An e-mail address is personal data.

    Thankfully, Lemmy instances do not transport this kind of information about their users to other instances!

    • hardypart@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      4
      Ā·
      1 year ago

      Maybe not IP addresses, but every post and comment you make is your personal data.

      • sunaurus@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        Ā·
        1 year ago

        Public posts and comments are, well, public (and thereā€™s no expectation from users that their posts and comments would be private, considering the nature of what Lemmy is).

        The only way to not transport public posts and comments to the rest of the internet (including but not limited to other Lemmy instances) would be to completely disconnect an instance from the internet šŸ˜…

        • nulldev@lemmy.vepta.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          Ā·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          GDPR does not distinguish between public or private data.

          GDPR handles public data through propagation. If you download public data that is GDPR covered, the data you downloaded also becomes GDPR covered. You are required to follow all GDPR regulations while handling the downloaded data.

          Remember, GDPR covers almost all ā€œcollected personal dataā€. It does not matter if the data was originally public, and how/where the data was collected. Itā€™s all covered.

          However, Lemmy instances may still be exempt from GDPR as they are non-commercial: https://gdpr-info.eu/recitals/no-18/

          IANAL as usual.

        • hardypart@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          Ā·
          1 year ago

          Youā€™re confusing ā€œprivateā€ with ā€œpersonalā€. My data can be public, but itā€™s still MY data and I have the right to decide what happens with it and if it should stay public. Thatā€™s what the GDPR says and thatā€™s exactly what OP is referring to.

          • sunaurus@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            Ā·
            1 year ago

            You are able to edit and remove your posts on your Lemmy instance. Other Lemmy instances may or may not also reflect these changes, but your instance admin does not have any authority or responsibility to ensure that your previously public posts get deleted anywhere else in the world other than the instance they run.

            Thatā€™s exactly how it works everywhere, itā€™s not a Lemmy specific thing. For example, if you write a public blog post on some public blog service, and later delete it, then it wonā€™t be the responsibility of the blog service owner to remove your post from elsewhere on the internet. It will be your own responsibility to manually request removal from other services which have copies of your post (like archvie.org etc).

            • hardypart@feddit.de
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              Ā·
              1 year ago

              your instance admin does not have any authority or responsibility to ensure that your previously public posts get deleted anywhere else in the world other than the instance they run.

              Please back up this claim. Iā€™m sure not even the best GDPR consultants out there could answer this question with confidence at this point in time.

              For example, if you write a public blog post on some public blog service, and later delete it, then it wonā€™t be the responsibility of the blog service owner to remove your post from elsewhere on the internet.

              This is a completely different thing. Weā€™re talking about the automatic replication that happens between the different Lemmy instances, not about someone copying your comment and posting it somewhere else.

              Again, I think you guys are handling OPā€™s topic way to leasurely. The GDPR is a beast with teeth and itā€™s going to bite your ass if you donā€™t take it seriously enough.

            • hardypart@feddit.de
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              Ā·
              1 year ago

              Now if you want to change that, youā€™ll have to request a GDPR deletion from every instance you posted it to.

              Thatā€™s the interesting point. Do I really have to do that or should I be able to rely on my instance owner thatā€™s located in the EU to take care of that? Iā€™m pretty sure none of us can answer this question. Decentralized services like the Fediverse are probably a new challange for GDPR experts.

              • Scaldart@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                Ā·
                1 year ago

                Iā€™m not supposing to have any answers either, but from a personal standpoint it seems rather selfish to even entertain the idea of making an instance owner do that. Itā€™s not like these people are getting paid for a service (aside from donations, in some cases); theyā€™re hosting in the spirit of the fediverse. Why would I pawn legal work off to them?

                • infamousbelgian@lemmy.mlOP
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  Ā·
                  1 year ago

                  You and I are not. But if a certain giant site that is currently making not theā€¦ euhā€¦ best decisions goes in to action with a large legal teamā€¦

                • hardypart@feddit.de
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  Ā·
                  1 year ago

                  Sure, but I in the end itā€™s not their responsibility.

                  You guys sound so confident, itā€™s not even funny. GDPR is a huge topic and everyone who already had to deal with it even marginally knows that OPā€™s fear is absolutely plausible. The GDPR doesnā€™t give a shit about causing major inconviences or huge workload for platform admins. Ever heard about the GDPR nightmare letter?

        • LollerCorleone@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          24
          Ā·
          1 year ago

          This. Federation doesnā€™t transfer private data of the user, just their public facing profile and posts. There is no expectation of them being private.

          • Monkey With A Shell@lemmy.socdojo.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            Ā·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            The admin of a site, not only fedi ones but any site, can only control whatā€™s in their reach. A user could ask as per the GDPR to have their profile and history removed, but data not in the control of the admin is not their responsibility.

            Consider it from the perspective of a traditional site, if someone takes a screenshot of something you post and puts it up somewhere else the originating site has no means to control that or to remove the data from a third party location. The same issue has been fought since the dawn of the internet, people trying to erase past events that have spread far and wide. There are even proffesional services available to try and scrub such things, but in the end if all they can do is send takedown requests to another jurisdiction itā€™s going to be an impossible task.

          • hardypart@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            3
            Ā·
            1 year ago

            ITT: People that donā€™t undertand the difference between ā€œpersonalā€ and ā€œprivateā€. My posts and comments are my personal data, even if theyā€™re public, and I have the right to decide what happens with it and if it should stay public. Thatā€™s what the GDPR says and thatā€™s exactly what OP is referring to.

            • AntY@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              Ā·
              1 year ago

              Personal data according to gdpr is data that can identify you or be tied to you as an individual. Such things are e-mail addresses, phone numbers, names and so on. Posts and comments does not necessarily fulfill this. If you post your name, yes, but this comment that Iā€™m making now would not be classified as personal data.

  • SavvyWolf@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    Ā·
    1 year ago

    IMO itā€™s pretty much the same case as email. With email you send data to some remote server which may or may not reside in the EU.

    Iā€™m not really sure what argument you can make that fediverse apps but not email break gdpr.

    Or even something as simple as putting your email on a public website that may be visited by someone in the US.

  • Ulu-Mulu-no-die@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    Ā·
    1 year ago

    all personal data from EU users must remain in the EU

    Create your account on a EU server, problem solved.

    Lemmy (fediverse in general) doesnā€™t send account data away, and posts donā€™t qualify as personal data, when you publish something to the internet, itā€™s public by definition.

    • FantasticFox@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      Ā·
      1 year ago

      Iā€™m not sure this is true. Like imagine someone posts their address in a Lemmy post - Iā€™m pretty sure that counts as PII and they have the right to request its deletion.

      • Ulu-Mulu-no-die@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        Ā·
        1 year ago

        Like imagine someone posts their address in a Lemmy post

        As you write it you can also delete it.

        Itā€™s still you willingly doing it, not the server spreading your data without your consent, this last case is where GDPR applies.

        But itā€™s a very stupid thing to do, never post your personal data in comments.

    • randomaccount43543@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      Ā·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      GDPR Art 4.(1) ā€˜personal dataā€™ means any information relating to an identified or identifiable natural person (ā€˜data subjectā€™); an identifiable natural person is one who can be identified, directly or indirectly, in particular by reference to an identifier such as a name, an identification number, location data, an online identifier or to one or more factors specific to the physical, physiological, genetic, mental, economic, cultural or social identity of that natural person;

      Every post and comment in Lemmy qualifies as personal data because they contain the ideas and opinions of an identifiable natural person (by their user handle). Therefore the Lemmy instances are handling personal data and must comply with the GDPR.

    • infamousbelgian@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      Ā·
      1 year ago

      Thanks! The info actually makes sense. Also, do note that every EU country has their own specific implementation of the GDPR law with very small differences. So this is written according to the UK implementation, but the BE implementation might be just a bit different.

      All complicated stuffā€¦

  • wintermute@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    Ā·
    1 year ago

    Since the entire goal of the fediverse is ā€œtransportingā€ all data to all servers inside the ActivityPub/fediverse world, the data of a EU member will be transported all over the place.

    It doesnā€™t work like that, think of your instance being a proxy to the fediverse

    • infamousbelgian@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      Ā·
      1 year ago

      Is it? I read somewhere that data effectively gets ā€œcopiedā€ to the different instances? But that might be wrong info :p

      • hardypart@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        Ā·
        1 year ago

        Youā€™re right. If someone from feddit.de subscribes to a lemmy.world community, the entire content of that community is going to be copied to the feddit.de server and thatā€™s the exact issue OP is referring to.

        • mkulima@baraza.africa
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          Ā·
          1 year ago

          Then it should be the responsibility of the EU people to avoid joining the fediverse. I do not see a practical way to align with GDPR. The effort is non-trivial and the rewards are extremely minimal.

          From your perspective, what should be the way out?

          • hardypart@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            Ā·
            1 year ago

            Then it should be the responsibility of the EU people to avoid joining the fediverse.

            The instances are providing their services in the EU, so itā€™s legally up to them to comply with the GDPR.

            From your perspective, what should be the way out?

            Honestly, no idea. Iā€™m not even sure if Lemmy in its current shape violates the GDPR in the first place, but if I were the admin of a large feddit instance in the EU I would make sure to get advise from a GDPR consultant.

    • hardypart@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      Ā·
      1 year ago

      But when a lemmy.world user subscribes to a feddit.de community, the entire community will be copied to the lemmy.world server, or am I wrong?

      • curiosityLynx@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        Ā·
        1 year ago

        You are indeed wrong. The email and IP addresses and passwords for example donā€™t get copied. Iā€™m not well versed enough about how it works to go into more detail.

        • hardypart@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          Ā·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          You are indeed wrong. The email and IP addresses and passwords for example donā€™t get copied.

          I never said that IP addresses and passwords were getting copied.

          The thing that no one seems to understand here is that all my posts, comments and votes and everything are my personal data. My data can be public, but itā€™s still MY data and I have the right to decide what happens with it and if it should stay public. Thatā€™s what the GDPR says and thatā€™s exactly what OP is referring to.

          • SkyNTP@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            Ā·
            1 year ago

            If what you say is true, thenā€¦ Email is illegal in the EU. EMAIL.

            Yeah, no, GDPR, although well intentioned against large corporate entities that have all the power in centralized system, is a relic in the context of federated technology. It is both completely unenforceable, and also not really relevant.

            • hardypart@feddit.de
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              Ā·
              1 year ago

              If what you say is true, thenā€¦ Email is illegal in the EU. EMAIL.

              No, but there are actually certain things you need to take into consideration when it comes to GDPR and email.

              What the GDPR says:

              Data erasure is a large part of the GDPR. It is one of the six data protection principles: Article 5(e) states that personal data can be stored for ā€œno longer than is necessary for the purposes for which the personal data are processed.ā€ Data erasure is also one of the personal rights protected by the GDPR in Article 17, the famous ā€œright to be forgotten.ā€ ā€œThe data subject shall have the right to obtain from the controller the erasure of personal data concerning him or her without undue delay.ā€ There are some exceptions to this latter requirement, such as the public interest. But generally speaking, you have an obligation to erase personal data you no longer need.

              What it means for email: Many of us never delete emails. There are plenty of good reasons: We may need to refer to them someday as a record of our activities or even for possible litigation. But the more data you keep, the greater your liability if thereā€™s a data breach. Moreover, the erasure of unneeded personal data is now required under European law. Because of the GDPR, you should periodically review your organizationā€™s email retention policy with the goal of reducing the amount of data your employees store in their mailboxes. The regulation requires you to be able to show that you have a policy in place that balances your legitimate business interests against your data protection obligations under the GDPR.

              https://gdpr.eu/email-encryption/

              I still donā€™t see a reason why Lemmy shouldnā€™t be affected by the GDPR and why itā€™s probably not compliant in its current state.

              • SkyNTP@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                Ā·
                1 year ago

                The last paragraph you quoted is in reference to individual responsability and how they access the data. Itā€™s equivalent to saying ā€œdonā€™t look at at this Fediverse post: you are GDPR compliant!ā€. This only helps you in litigation. We both know that says nothing of where the data can exist. And this is true for any federated system, including email.

                Itā€™s also completely asinine. Suddenly we need to burn snail mail after reading it? Why receive any mail at all if everything is a giant piece of liability? Thereā€™s a social contract in communication: a certain assumption that if you give someone a piece of informtion, you are doing just that: giving, not lending. ā€œLending informationā€ upsets the social structure. GDPR has to be tempered in reality, and this starts even before the fediverse.

                Like I said, GDPR is imperfect. It was written in the context of and solves a problem created by centralized institutions and large beaurocracies. It is also completely unenforceable in a decentralized system. It hardly seems relevant anyway.

                Realisticalpy speaking, those tempered interpretations are probably already existant, and there is already enough precedent for this to be a nothing burger.

                • hardypart@feddit.de
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  Ā·
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  This whole thread is full of interpretations and gut feelings. Literally no one here backs up their claims with any kind of evidence.

        • hardypart@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          Ā·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          I think you, being an admin of a huge Lemmy instance, would be well advised to educate yourself on the difference between ā€œpublicā€ and ā€œpersonalā€ when it comes to GDPR compliance. All the data I create here is my personal data, no matter if itā€™s my IP, my mail address, posts, comments or votes and the GDPR says that itā€™s my right to decide what happens with my data and if it should stay public. The fact that I post something publicly doesnā€™t make my data non-personal.

    • infamousbelgian@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      Ā·
      1 year ago

      Ok, so I did some checking regarding the location and stuff, since Iā€™m clearly not informed enough about this. However, my point still stands (I think).

      Copy pasted from Twilio. I guess they are better aware than I am about the rulesā€¦

      The general principle for transfers is outlined in Article 44, which can be summed up as saying, if you transfer EU personal data out of the EU, make sure that this data still enjoys the same level of protection it gets under GDPR. In other words, the entity or company that you pass the data to outside the EU must be under a legally binding obligation to follow GDPR data protection principles or the equivalent. (Unlike an outright prohibition on extraterritorial data transfers, this actually makes sense. No point if having rules if those rules get tossed out the window just by moving the data out of the EU.)

      and also:

      This legally binding obligation can be achieved in multiple ways. Here is a sampling:
      
      1. The entity to whom you pass the data to happens to be in a country that has data protection laws that are just as strong as GDPR (as determined by the EU Commission).
      2. The entity to whom you pass the data to agrees by legally binding contract to follow GDPR principles of data protection.
      3. The company has enacted Binding Corporate Rules.
      4. There is some regulatory-approved code of conduct to which the entity subscribes.
      

      So, if someone opens up an instance in, letā€™s say, Ethiopia or the US, it is not compliant, afaik.

      However, question remains about the proxy thingy of the fediverse. Is data copied/stored on other instances OR does it remain on the instance that I subscribed to. And what if that instance is located in a ā€œnon-GDPR-compliant-environmentā€?

    • infamousbelgian@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      Ā·
      1 year ago

      I donā€™t think a TOS will hold up. GDPR (and the implementation per country) is a law. You canā€™t bypass a law with a TOS, I think.

      However, Iā€™m definitely not a GDPR expertā€¦