• deaf_fish@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    You are wrong

    Good, I am ready to learn.

    A society that shares my free speech values recognizes that “removing people from society” is an offensive act…

    Ok, so, we have Hitler 2. They have just formed their options about how they hate whatever group and want them dead. They then go to talk to others about how problematic this target group is. And then everyone just ignore them because they implicitly are aware what Hitler 2 is talking about will eventually lead to violence?

    Is that right?

    • Rivalarrival@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      Replace “Hitler 2” with “Fred Phelps” of the Westboro Baptist Church, and you can see how that scenario turned out for Fred. Basically, yes.

      In a society that values free speech, the idea of “how they hate whatever group and want them dead” is the antithesis of that philosophy. Any time he “talks to others” about the people he hates, they recognize he is preaching an opinion contrary to that philosophy. Consequently, they shun him, rather than follow him. They leave him to say what he wants, but his speech alienates people instead of helping him consolidate power.

      Fascism is destroyed when nobody - not you; not Hitler 2 - has power to silence dissent.