• PsychedSy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    I feel like intolerance is kind of a wildcard. The initial intolerance could be anything from asking an ignorant question to trying to start a genocide, and the responding intolerance is much the same.

    It’s kind of like having a function that ignores the parameters and just gives a random response to intolerance. We agree because we’ve actually mapped the initial action to our reaction, so we know that with this input we get this other output.

    Did I explain my objection well enough this time? I know it’s probably me not knowing how to explain it properly.

    • deaf_fish@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 months ago

      Yeah, this makes sense. Would you feel better about the this: “It’s ok to punch fascists”? Using the common definition for all these terms. I know this is slightly different from what OP was posting about.

      • PsychedSy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        It depends on the fascist? Common language suggests they’re, what? None of them have real political ideals.

        I’m good with punching people that use slurs or rhetoric to attack others,

        • deaf_fish@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          6 months ago

          Fascists want power to hurt people. They think they are making the world a better place by “removing” a “bad” group of people.

          When do you start punching these people? If never, they are going to kill and harm a lot of people.

          • PsychedSy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            6 months ago

            So, you start punching when they get credibly threatening. We let them be fucky and loud and when it gets violent or close to, we do damage.