• threelonmusketeers@sh.itjust.worksOPM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    6 months ago

    I’m not surprised that it didn’t launch in 2023, but I am surprised it was cancelled entirely. I wonder if the Polaris program would ever do something similar?

    • j4k3@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      6 months ago

      Maybe. Smarter Every Day on YT had a couple of uploads where he implied that SpaceX’s lack of commitments and schedules or even proof of critical technology was a major problem for Artemis and all other phases of the program. There probably isn’t time for everything else.

      • burble@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        Destin has too much of a Huntsville bias. Listening to old heads wax poetic about Apollo and how things “should be” or whatever then complaining about Starship is totally missing the point of Artemis and the roots of its issues. SLS and Orion couldn’t be much worse if they tried, and NASA was way too late on contracting HLS and suits. And a rover. And a hab. It isn’t SpaceX’s fault that their pie in the sky idea that was RFQ’ed way too late is too big and complicated for what Artemis 3 needs.

    • shirro
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      6 months ago

      The first Polaris mission is on an existing proven vehicle and the suits look to be in the final stages. It seems to have taken a lot longer than anticipated but I don’t know if cancellation is likely. If aspects look too difficult they can alter the mission. The risk for the later Polaris Starship program is that Starship gets stuck in development hell which is still very possible.

      There have been a number of tech companies that produced very successful and innovative products only to run into a brick wall with a successor product that was too ambitious or made wrong choices and either never made it to market or arrived too late.

      The booster, raptor engines and launch infrastructure have been impressive and a lot of fun to watch but now we get to re-entry, full and rapid re-use, orbital refueling etc and the risks of a serious roadblock that eats all the cash and time increases in my opinion. I think it is great that companies are literally pursuing moonshot projects but we have to manage expectations.

      • threelonmusketeers@sh.itjust.worksOPM
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        Oh, I meant “I wonder if Polaris would ever do a similar mission”, but I can see how my comment was ambiguous.

        Polaris Dawn has been delayed a bit, but it looks like it has a good chance of launching in the next few months.

  • Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    Mazaewa is a social media influencer that likely made millions off of propoganda surrounding this project. I always found his brand of flashy billionaire playboy to be dispicable and loathe that I was required to follow him on social media while he and his team judged my entry for the dear moon project. Why exactly did this fall apart? Mazaewa is walking away with elevated presence and his pockets even fuller. Gross.

    • burble@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      6 months ago

      At the very least, to I’m glad when billionaires spend their money on this kind of thing instead of yachts or an island or whatever. But yeah, I’m not a.big fan of Maezawa’s “brand”.