No way did trump say that!

  • aseriesoftubes@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    104
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    6 months ago

    … Donald Trump posted on his social media platform in all caps that “I DON’T EVEN KNOW WHAT THE CHARGES ARE IN THIS RIGGED CASE.”

    “I AM ENTITLED TO SPECIFICITY JUST LIKE ANYONE ELSE,” he wrote.

    Maybe you should have stayed awake instead of farting yourself to sleep every day.

    The post comes after Trump watched Judge Merchan spend over an hour instructing the jury on the law and specific charges in the case…

    😙🤌

    • AbouBenAdhem@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      72
      ·
      6 months ago

      They should ask him what he thinks he’s on trial for—he might confess to something that hasn’t even been uncovered yet.

      • ironhydroxide@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        24
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        That only works if the person being questioned has a consience. Drumpf would most likely answer “because I’m supposed to be the president, the election was rigged and they kicked me out, now I’m on trial to keep me from going back”

    • Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      6 months ago

      Honest question. How did we get here? How are we discussing the very real world situation where an elderly sex offender who probably won’t see a jail, (but absolutely would if he had been just some nobody) is running for president, again…

      Against another elderly man, whom everybody seems to dislike but everybody is going to vote for again because the other guy is even worse.

      Both candidates very well could die in the next 4 years, and the stress of the job dramatically increases those odds.

      Biden is older at 81, while trump is 77 (according to google), but Biden is much more physically healthy, whereas if Weeble-Wobbles wanted to make a trump liscensed Weeble-Wobble they wouldn’t need to make a new body shape for them. Just use the existing shape.

      How did we get here? How did we get to the point where everything sucks, everybody knows it sucks, but we’re just supposed to along with it…and we do!

      So now we get to watch as a clearly mentally incomplete elderly man falls asleep, and farts in the court room. I’m unclear if its illegal to do that, but you have to imagine whomever the judge was had to be offended at the very least. With anyone else, I’d say it’s a bad idea to piss off the judge of your case. In this case though, I’m not sure it matters. He doesn’t face responsibility for anything. He doesn’t care. This is all a mockery to him.

      HOW DID WE GET HERE???

      • disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        Heavy oppression of the poor through underfunded education and social systems, coupled with propagandist media preying on their fear of the unfamiliar while blaming their oppression on the Democrats’ desire to help everyone but them. Like it or not, many of them are the victims, not the problem.

      • CheeseNoodle@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        6 months ago

        If it makes you feel better the UKs only been in election season for a week and we’ve already seen 2 different attempts at election interferance by the current ruling party.

        • Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          6 months ago

          Doesn’t so much make me feel “better” as makes my sadness cover more ground. Like “Oh shit! This bullshit isn’t an Americzn thing? It’s just a human thing???”

          I was joking to myself earlier that if Earth were a Lemmy instance, I’d register on a different instsnce.

      • interdimensionalmeme@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        6 months ago

        First past the post’s logical conclusion Also paying for sex is not a crime, neither is paying them to shut up about it. Why can’t they use his other real crimes instead of that monica lewinsky bullshit ?

        • disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          16
          ·
          edit-2
          6 months ago

          The crime is falsifying business records, not paying for hush money. He also didn’t pay her for sex. She’s a porn actress and model, not a prostitute.

          The documents case is postponed indefinitely by Judge Cannon. The same goes for the Federal election trial by Chutkan, pending SCOTUS’s ruling on presidential immunity. The Georgia election case is pending a state Senate investigation of the DA, Fani Willis.

          Here’s a handy trial tracker by the Associated Press.

          • disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            edit-2
            6 months ago

            He didn’t pay her for sex. He pressured her into it. He paid her not to tell anyone until after the election, but hid the payments as compensation for his personal attorney while in office. He’s being charged with falsifying business records.

            • voluble@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              6 months ago

              It’s true that sex wasn’t paid for. The role of pressure in this case is complicated.

              If anyone is curious to read Daniels’ own words on this, check out the pdf court transcripts for May 7th and May 9th.

              The transcripts are long, but interesting, and worth reading if you have a few hours. As a normie, I was only interested in the sex stuff. The facts surrounding documents seem pretty clear.

        • towerful@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          Getting a blowjob wasn’t the crime. Lying under oath was the crime.
          Same with this. The sex and hush money isn’t a crime, it’s the false business records that are

          • interdimensionalmeme@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            6 months ago

            Makes sense, feels like low hanging fruit with sex based humiliation on the part of the prosecution. I wish they’d go against his worst, actual crimes, especially the presidential crimes and neuter future presidents from doing those crimes as well.

    • tsonfeir@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      “Ask your lawyer”

      I don’t even have a lawyer that can beat these charges. I am entitled to a lawyer who can beat these charges.

  • Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    89
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    I sure hope she couldn’t. Mother Theresa was a fucking monster that literally kept her patients willfully in pain because she believed the pain kept them closer to her deity.

    Giving her a pass for fucking a porn star and using campaign funds to pay her off would be even more insane than giving a racist rapist a pass.

    • ours@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      36
      ·
      6 months ago

      She rose to fame on the suffering of others. Trump and her have more in common than most would think.

      • dual_sport_dork 🐧🗡️@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        30
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        She also took in who-knows-how-much in donations to charity claiming they would be used to help the stick and the poor, but instead just gave that money directly to the Vatican who proceeded to do fuck all to the benefit of anybody with it except themselves.

        • ours@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          22
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          Oh but that sweet donation gave her a nice shiny sainthood post mortem.

          Too bad I don’t believe in hell so I could wish she would roast there. Instead the Church’s PR made her name synonymous with selflessly caring for the poor.

    • disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      It’s actually a pretty good analogy.

      She was a huge hypocrite for telling suffering patients that pain brought them closer to god, while withholding pain medication and anesthetics that she then eagerly accepted when she took ill.

      Trump is going to drain the swamp of criminals in the White House that are oppressing the American people.

  • echo@lemmings.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    44
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    Mother Teresa was a horrible, self-serving person not entirely unlike Trump.

  • collapse_already@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    ·
    6 months ago

    What I hear: "The evidence before the court is incontrovertible, I clearly committed the crimes alleged. "

  • otp@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    6 months ago

    Huh. This makes sense…

    He’s appealing to the kind of people that think that someone who is a good person shouldn’t be found guilty of a crime.

    Only bad people need to be punished for their crimes.

  • IamSparticles@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    6 months ago

    “We’ll see how we do,” Trump said as the jury began its deliberations. “It’s a very disgraceful situation.”

    You are correct, but not for the reason you think.

  • SulaymanF@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    6 months ago

    He’s trying to set expectations for his followers.

    Like how he’s insisting that Biden is some insane genius at debating, so when Trump is scored as losing debates by pundits it won’t sting as much.

  • acutfjg@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    6 months ago

    Not sure where the surprise is coming from. He’s been saying stupid shit for a long time

  • will_a113@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    6 months ago

    This is actually pretty clever. If he’s found guilty then it’s rigged since even Mother Teresa would have been found guilty. If he’s found not guilty though, then he’s even better than Mother Teresa, since he beat a rap that would have taken her down or whatever.

    • krashmo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      6 months ago

      He’s not clever. He’s a gigantic fucking moron. Don’t give him more credit than he’s due.

      • Hylactor@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        6 months ago

        I don’t know anything about Trumps childhood, but it feels like he was raised by fairly cold, taciturn, sociopaths. I wonder if his whole childhood was just a masterclass in tantrums and getting a reaction out of people. Would explain a lot about his stengths and weaknesses.

        • kaitco@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          edit-2
          6 months ago

          Dude…This is the most Trump thing I’ve ever read.

          Trump agreed to donate (the sculptures) to the Met as long as the costs and the ability to physically remove the Art Deco artifacts were not unreasonably expensive.

          Trump surprised New York’s art community on June 5, 1980 when a demolition crew jackhammered the sculptures off of the building. In addition, the intricate grillwork was removed. The destruction drew a public outcry. The Met received no advance notice.

          Trump initially avoided any comment about the Bonwit Teller artwork. But John Baron, a spokesperson with the Trump Organization, contacted the New York Daily News to discuss the situation. Baron informed the Daily News that “the merit of the stones was not great enough to justify the effort to save them.” Baron stated that the removal process could have set back Trump Tower’s construction timeline by two weeks. Baron also told the New York Times that he had no idea what happened to the ornate grillwork.

          Long after Baron’s initial contact, the New York Daily News learned that John Baron was actually Donald Trump, in disguise.

          Board and staff members at the Met were furious and confused about Baron’s claims that the sculptures lacked merit. “Can you imagine the Met accepting them if they were not of artistic merit?” asked Ashton Hawkins, a Met board member.

          The day after “Baron” called the Daily News, Donald Trump released a statement, claiming that the sculptures had to be reduced to stones. “My biggest concern was the safety of people on the street below…people could have been killed. To me, it would not have been worth that kind of risk.”

          Though Trump claimed that the removal of the sculptures would have cost his organization approximately $500,000, an initial estimate, made public, amounted to a $32,000 expense.

          • Dagwood222@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            6 months ago

            lol!

            You scared me! When you said “The most Trump thing ever” I thought you meant something I’d posted!

            The wicked flee where no man pursueth!

            Glad you liked the article, please share it out.

    • BarqsHasBite@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      6 months ago

      This is what he does with everything. He set up Afghanistan pullout timing it at the end of his term. Success? It was all him. Failure? It was all Biden.

  • Jo Miran@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    6 months ago

    This country’s fucked justice system will never convict that piece of shit.

  • xmunk@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    6 months ago

    Mother Theresa wouldn’t be facing these charges… and if she was, there wouldn’t be mountains of evidence clearly pointing at her guilt.

      • xmunk@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        Please replace ‘Mother Theresa’ with whomever you think is the most morally unimpeachable - the actual person doesn’t matter here because it’s an idiom…

        I’m well aware that she, personally, wasn’t all sunshine and roses.

        • Cosmoooooooo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          6 months ago

          If you could please stop pretending that she was all sunshine and roses, that’d be super. There’s some in the back that don’t quite get it yet.

          • xmunk@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            6 months ago

            As I clarified - it’s an idiom. I was not trying to imply she’s was an awesome person, just mirroring Trump’s phrasing.

          • GBU_28@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            6 months ago

            That never occurred.

            Mother Theresa would not be facing charges of paying a porn star with campaign money, as we have no evidence or even hint that that ever occurred.