• JeeBaiChow@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      Oh get out of here with your facts. The kids are having a circlejerk. They weren’t born at the time. They can’t be expected to know these things.

    • DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      Oh, he’s just following orders!

      It’s not like we have other laws requiring you not to support genocide for this exact situation that he can use to halt arms shipments.

    • XeroxCool@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      11
      ·
      5 months ago

      What is that law? Closest I think I can get is HR 4986 sec 227 which mentions Israel, but I can’t read further. Who put it in place?

      • davidagain@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        5 months ago

        From the linked politico article,

        Legally, the U.S. can’t cut Israel off completely. Since 2008, the U.S. has had to weigh all arms sales to Israel and other countries in the region against the requirement that Israel maintains a “qualitative military edge” against all enemies, both state and non-state actors.

        In 2008, George W. Bush was in his second term as president.

        • XeroxCool@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          5 months ago

          Yes, Bush was the president for most of 2008. Obama got a short portion, although the exact president in place doesn’t necessarily tell you if they agreed anyway. Since president’s don’t really write law, I was looking for the exact law to see the history of which representatives were pushing it. I wanted to see what the angle was for that piece of the bill and what else was attached to it. Nothing gets passed as an individual law, meaning it was probably a rider in a much larger group of laws that likely made it a non-negotiable requirement bundled into a more pressing matter.

          But I guess 9+ people read my simple question as total contempt for the situation.

          • idiomaddict@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            5 months ago

            Obama was inaugurated in January 2009, though he was elected in 2008, so it’s easy to confuse.