• S_204@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    6 months ago

    No one needs to change the definition when you’re working overtime to twist what I’m saying. I never said you needed to be arrested for violating the Constitution. I’m pointing out the clear and obvious fact that Free speech before they make hunger so it is being stifled…

    That you’re supporting this just shows how fascist the claimed progressives have become in America… if you’re afraid of someone speaking then challenge them with ideas. Don’t shut them down. I get that’s what you’re taught to do on campus now, but that’s not an effective way to deal with someone or something you disagree with.

    • Hacksaw@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      Absolutely not! You may have a right to speak but you have no right to an audience. Just because someone wants to talk it doesn’t mean I have to “challenge their ideas”. I can just not listen. And if they want to come speak in my house I can trespass them. That’s what the Democrats are doing.

      You can speak, but no one needs to listen. Some ideas don’t deserve the respect of a challenge. Anything Bibi wants to say right now is easily in that range.

      • S_204@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        Yes you can. Just not listen. That’s a very good point. Not listening is very different from scuttling the invitation provided by the speaker of the house.

        • Hacksaw@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          Not really. Either way you’re not listening. In one case you’re not listening as a group.

          You ever get tired of shilling for genocide?