• brbposting@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      6 months ago

      Screenprint the notice right on the shirt: this shirt supports Bangladeshi child welfare

      Kinda makes everyone else jerks if they’re buying clothes from makers who could afford their next meal regardless.

      • JJROKCZ@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        I have several polo Ralph Lauren clothing items in my home, the logo hasn’t changed significantly in 30+ years in shape or size on the normal polos. They do have some items that have the polo logo or the teddy bear larger but those are in the main Ralph Lauren line for fashion, not the Polo line polo shirts that are a business casual intent

  • higgsboson@dubvee.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    72
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    I always make car dealers take their own sticker or badge off of any vehicle I buy. I usually offer to keep the advertising in place, in exchange for a discount, but they never take me up on it.

      • modifier@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        25
        ·
        6 months ago

        Hell yeah, brandalism is already too pervasive and just kind of accepted. Good on you.

    • MonkeMischief@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      6 months ago

      Funny to see this, because I haven’t bought a vehicle in a long time, but I had the EXACT same thought.

      I grimace every time I see that hideous “CarMax - - -” decal stuck to the actual car body.

      Same with license plate frames that are like “Huge ‘Dicky’ Richard’s Auto Circus Emporium Honda Jeep Lexus - We rub you right!

      At least those just tell me “the driver is likely lazy or can’t identify a screwdriver.” But an actual decal? Yeah they better take it off, and discount me if they scratch it in the process. :p

      Obnoxious, man.

      • credit crazy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        At least they aren’t riveting badges onto cars anymore I’ve heard that used to be super common during the 60s and 70s Personally I hate how my 56 bel air has a AAA of Syracuse screwed into the bodywork of my trunk so even if I remove it there’s still going to be a hole in my trunk so I’m personally pretty glad all this branding today are just decals and stickers that can easily be removed with a eraser wheel or plastic blades

  • Addv4@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    6 months ago

    The irony is that this is often true. I have always preferred shirts that have minimal advertising on them (preferably none, but a dime sized insignia is generally the best you get) but they are notably harder to find and when you do, they are more expensive. The happy medium I have found is looking for used Polo type shirts that were expensive when new, which I can generally find cheaply because collars aren’t a popular look these days.

    • variants@possumpat.io
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      6 months ago

      You mean blank t-shirts? Because blank t-shirts are usually a lot cheaper than ones with a logo, and most other kinds of shirts I don’t usually see logos on them but maybe we shop in different places. For t-shirts I used to get them from a screen printing vendor because I liked ha ING multiple different colored shirts and they were usually around like 2-3 dollars per shirt depending on the brand

      • Addv4@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        Not bad, but I was mostly referring to brand names, generally with better fabric than just blank t shirts. I have plenty of those shirts that have Pima or other expensive fabrics that I paid $5-20 for a piece used. They are a lot more comfortable, and generally last longer.

  • southsamurai@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    6 months ago

    Yeah, that’s why I won’t wear stuff like that

    Now, there’s the adjacent, but not the same thing of band shirts or similar merchandise. The difference is that in theory, the band/artist is going to benefit from the purchase. It is still advertising that I’m paying for, but, because merchandise is often a big income stream for musicians in particular, I don’t object to being their billboard if I like them enough to get anything of theirs in the first place.

    When it’s a clothing company? Hell no. If their label/logo is more than the size of a tag, I’m not doing it. I don’t mind the idea of a trademark/label/tag being present, that’s expected. It’s when the branding becomes the design that it’s a problem.

    • MonkeMischief@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      6 months ago

      Yeah I’m fond of the “Tshirts that make a statement” thing.

      It’s personal expression to say “Hey I’m really into this band and I might’ve gone to this concert!” Could be a conversation starter too, and it supports the band or artist like you said!

      But I really don’t understand people walking around with some billboard from a clothing mega-brand. You’re literally paying them to do marketing work for them lol.

  • 🇰 🌀 🇱 🇦 🇳 🇦 🇰 ℹ️@yiffit.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    I wish this was a thing… All the shirts I’ve gotten in the last few years have been $40-50 and have the brand’s logo on the back near the neckline (they also came with stickers that are advertising the brand). I would usually only spend $5-10 for a shirt, but these are limited prints and most of them are on really good, comfortable shirts. Just look how cool my newest one is:

  • jaschen@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    6 months ago

    I even take the badges off my car. Nobody needs to know what brand I have.

  • 😈MedicPig🐷BabySaver😈@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    6 months ago

    I admit I buy T-shirts at micro-breweries. I do support those that I actually buy. Additionally, it helps me keep record of my journey of visiting many breweries.

    I’ve even turned some of my collection into a king sized quilt and a lap quilt. So, my shirts are very useful in more ways than one.

  • spujb@lemmy.cafe
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    6 months ago

    ironically technically not true

    one principle of marketing is the knowledge that the brand actually adds (perceived) value for many consumers, and so they are willing to pay more

    • Glowstick@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      6 months ago

      It’s true that this is how most consumers act. It’s dumb, but iirc it’s factually correct.

      If you take a brand name shirt, remove the logo in a way that is visually perfect, and sell them side-by-side, then the logo shirt will outsell the non-logo shirt. Or so I’ve heard.

      • spujb@lemmy.cafe
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        6 months ago

        Absolutely. There are definitely people like OP who prefer products without branding, but for the majority (average) of consumers in many markets, the branding actually adds value.

    • MonkeMischief@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 months ago

      “SuPrEmE” somehow did this and created a rabid following over some of the most basic stuff I’ve ever seen. It’s a meme now to just stick their logo on like, a literal brick so it’s suddenly more “desirable.”

      Truly boggles the mind.

      • spujb@lemmy.cafe
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        6 months ago

        That is an extreme example of this, yes. Other examples of branding can be much more subtle and deft, e.g. Apple’s product design. It’s not in-your-face but nevertheless it’s present and adds to the consumer experience and perception of value.

  • kylua@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    6 months ago

    that’s why I don’t like buying t-shirt with brand logos on, I feel like companies are using me as means to reach out to new customers

  • neo@lemy.lol
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    6 months ago

    And that is why, with our new triangle shaped business model, you and your customers are getting paid for wearing our shirts!

    That’s right! The more shirts you buy, the more you are getting paid! Just grap a couple of friends and get rich together!

  • ramble81@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    You’re paying for an ad-free experience with no logo. You could always make your own ad-blocked and cover up the logo on scrape it off if you want the cheaper one with no ads.

  • JoshuaFalken@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    6 months ago

    When shirts are worn less than a dozen times on average before they get tossed in the landfill, those branded shirt companies should be paying you.

    Convenient video from today about this exact topic.

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 months ago

      With very few exceptions, I will wear a shirt until it’s just not wearable anymore. If the image is really faded, I don’t care much.

      The only exceptions right now are two shirts I still have from my previous job that I hated. I’m mostly keeping them around in case my wife wants them for some sort of craft project.