I honestly don’t believe I will have any legal trouble because I don’t do anything like cp or worse, I just pirate media I like, not even porn. But across users of communities, or on public trackers, is IP exposure something to be concerned about?

  • Ilandar
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    2 months ago

    What do you mean by “the government doesn’t care”? Do you mean that they are not enforcing copyright protection laws to your knowledge? Or that copyright protection laws don’t actually exist in your country at all? If the laws exist but are not being enforced, there is always a possibility that they will be enforced in the future or that a change in government will lead to a change in approach. Your government could also potentially pass new laws in the future that make it easier for foreign entities to go after yourself and other pirates through your local courts.

    You need to work out exactly what the law in your country says, what the government’s attitude towards piracy is and whether there is a legal precedent in your country for the prosecution of pirates. For example, in Australia we have copyright laws and a government that is at least somewhat committed to upholding them, but we also had a significant court case a little over a decade ago in which it was ruled that the ISP being sued was not responsible for the piracy its users were allegedly engaging in. This essentially set a legal precedent within Australia that allows ISPs to turn a blind eye to piracy and makes it more difficult for foreign entities to prosecute Australian pirates. This is why most court-ordered anti-piracy action within Australia is limited to DNS blocks on websites. As a result, many Australians feel safe torrenting without a VPN because they believe it is very unlikely their ISP could be compelled in court to hand over their information or that there is even the will to attempt this following that high profile defeat in 2012.

    • TheHooligan95@lemmy.dbzer0.comOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      In my country it is illegal to share, but not illegal to download, since when consuming you’re not meant as a websurfer to know the source of that something. Should that law change, it cannot retroactively affect something that happened in the past. So I don’t plan ever to share anything publicly, but only the very few things I’m very passionate about to the point I want to share them with communities of friends which you can access through invites only. Sharing a back up copy with your friends is not illegal either even if the EULA or whatever says it is, unlike for example in the UK.

      I was specifically asking about cybersecurity in general.

            • enkers@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              edit-2
              2 months ago

              I think that’s not necessarily true. There’s certainly some good reasons to have a distinction between the original uploader and all the rest of the additional seeders. It’s going to come down to local law.

              An analogy is if you buy some illicit substance and split it up with a few friends who pay you their share. Whether or not your local authorities considers you an illegal drug dealer could be highly dependent on scale, profitability, frequency, clientele, etc. Those details could be the difference between a slap on the wrist and some hard time.

              • tobogganablaze@lemmus.org
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                2 months ago

                I can’t speak for every obscure jurisdiction that might exist, but I’ve never heard of that being a factor.

                • enkers@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  I don’t know the laws that well, but there is a distinction in Canadian law between uploading and downloading. I’m not entirely sure how applicable to torrenting that is, but I think there’s a reasonable argument that if you are the original uploader, you must have uploaded the content in it’s entirety, whereas that’s not necessarily true for anyone else downloading the torrent, and certainly not provably so.

        • PirateJesus@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          @[email protected] Lol. Torrenting is sharing. And for now you haven’t been visited, but I’m certain Hollywood will pay a visit to your local enforcer chief to explain to him the technicalities over fine wine & dinner.

          The risk is still there. Keep your share ratios to 3 so you don’t look like a big problem as @[email protected] put it. And when you get a letter from somebody complaining, it’s time to start looking into a VPN.

          The second best thing to do is your own research into your country’s laws, and subscribing to e-mail alerts so you can know if the law will change. At least a google alert at a minimum.

      • NoneYa@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        2 months ago

        In my country it is illegal to share, but not illegal to download

        By torrenting, you are sharing by default as it’s P2P. Even if you choose not to seed after downloading, you’re still sharing while you are downloading as other people who download after you are downloading chunks of the data from your partially downloaded data too.

        So technically you are still committing a crime here.

        Should that law change, it cannot retroactively affect something that happened in the past

        Not necessarily. Very tyrannical governments don’t care and will tread on your rights even going backwards before the law was enacted if they so desire to do so.

        Most laws don’t apply retroactively, but some can and do.

      • Joe@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        2 months ago

        In some countries private law firms chase down infringers on behalf of copyright holders. They then attempt shakedowns with the threat of legal action if you don’t pay. They have a financial interest to catch people, and moral compasses vary.

        Also, mistakes can happen (you, your family, guests using your wifi, in the courts, in the ISPs, in the law firms, in the tech they are using to identify people). Shit happens.

        And if (when) it happens, then you would still have to deal with it, costing you time and money.

        Understand the risks and make choices to minimize them if you can.

      • Ilandar
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 months ago

        Sorry, I misunderstood what you were asking then since IP monitoring is a commonly used by copyright trolls.