• Aussiemandeus
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    Divide a metre by 4 and you get 0.25 meters or 25cm

    Dived a foot by 4 you get 3 inches.

    Dived a yard by 4 you get 9inches

    Metric here wins in my opinion.

    Now let’s go by 3

    1m by 3 is yes 33.3r not great but 1m is 100cm and that’s how it is.

    1ft by 3 is 4 inches. Sure looks great now.

    Except size resolution is far greater in metric in simple forms

    Every inch is 2.54 cm obviously they dont round up nicely.

    Once we have to go smaller than an inch we need 15/16s of a inch, smaller then a cm we drop down to mm.

    10mm makes a cm.

    In super practical terms i need a spanner, 16mm is to big, i get the 15 next.

    5/8 is to big what do i get next?

    (I know the answer)

    Also another argument is well whats if you need half a mm etc we just use 0.5m or 0.7mm etc

    Very small sizes for most everyone day to day.

    Sure it’s not great breaking it too 0.whatever, but metric does it so much smaller as imperial made that jump to incorporate a size smaller then an inch.

    1/4 inch is just 0.25 inches

      • guyrocket@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        8 months ago

        I think this is it. The 5 factors instead of 3.

        I also think there was something to do with fractions of an inch too. Like that divisibility was also an advantage of imperial.

      • Aussiemandeus
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        I was going to mention the base number issue but couldn’t be bothered, i had just only woken up