We are experiencing daily cyberattacks from Russia, election interference, and propaganda specifically targeting American’s views across the political spectrum. There is a dictionary definition of “hostility” and what Russia is doing and has been doing for years fits it precisely. You don’t get to make up your own definition any more than you get to make up your own facts.
Hostility: noun,plural hos·til·i·ties.
a hostile state, condition, or attitude; enmity; antagonism; unfriendliness.
It’s sad when people believe their own propaganda, make up their own facts and even go so far as to make up definitions to common English words. Dispute and hostility mean what they mean, not what you want them to mean.
And the “completely disproven” election interference? Completely proven.
A tiny portion of just the unredacted findings we know about from the Senate Intelligence Report on Russian Interference in the 2016 Election:
The Committee’s bipartisan Report unambiguously shows that members of the
Trump Campaign cooperated with Russian efforts to get Trump elected. It recounts efforts by
Trump and his team to obtain dirt on their opponent from operatives acting on behalf of the
Russian government. It reveals the extraordinary lengths by which Trump and his associates
actively_sought to enable the Russian interference operation by amplifying its electoral impact
and rewarding its perpetrators - even after being warned of its Russian origins. And it presents,
for the first time, concerning evidence that the head of the Trump Campaign was directly
connected to the Russian meddling through his communications with an individual found to be a
Russian intelligence officer.
Additionally, the Committee’s bipartisan Report shows that, at the June 9, 2016
meeting in Trump Tower, senior members of the Campaign sought, explicitly, to receive
derogatory information for electoral benefit from a Russian lawyer known to have ties to the
Russian government, with the understanding that the information was part of “Russia and its
government’s support for Mr. Trump.” Prior to and during that meeting, members of the Trump
Campaign’s leadership clearly stated their desire to receive the promised derogatory Russian
information, and ultimately they also clearly expressed their displeasure that the Russian
information that was presented was not sufficiently damaging.
The Committee’s bipartisan Report shows that, during the campaign, Donald
Trump and the Trump Organization were pursuing a business deal in Russia. This is a topic
about which the Campaign and its associates misled the public and Congress. The Committee’s
Report shows that Trump’s outreach to the Kremlin began early and that during the Republican’ ’
primary campaign, around the time that Trump authorized pursuit of the Russia deal, Trump
asked for an in-person meeting with Putin.
There may be some who attempt to minimize the seriousness of Trump’s actions, or
the actions of his associates, by arguing that these individuals were motivated simply by self-
interest or self-promotion. This argument overlooks that when self-interest is intertwined with
the goals of a malign Russian influence operation, and when self-interest promotes the known
Russian effort while also being promote~ by that same Russian effort, then self-interest and
Russia’s interest become one and the same. Moreover, this argument misunderstands the deep
counterintelligence vulnerability that is created when those who seek positions of great power, or
proximity to that power, are willing to trade away national security for personal gain.
Candidate Trump’s pursuit of private business in Russia during the campaign, and his
Campaign Chairman Paul Manafort’s deep financial ties to a Kremlin-aligned Russian.oligarch
during the campaign, are not the only sources of leverage to which Trump and his Campaign
were vulnerable. The Committee’s bipartisan Report shows that dt1ring the campaign Trump
maintained personal correspondence with a Russian oligarch and his adult son on topics
including the upcoming U.S. election. The Moscow-based oligarch and his son, who were
involved in offering the Trump Campaign derogatory information related to the election and who
gave Trump a sizable gift during the Campaign, maintain significant and concerning connections
'not only to Kremlin leadership but also to Russian organized crime. Trump had previously done
business with the oligarch in Moscow.
Just keep telling yourself that there was no conspiracy between the Trump campaign and Russia, despite the copious evidence to the contrary. Self-delusion seems to be a maga specialty and you’ve got it down.
So the guy who wrote this book that has caused all this controversy came out and clarified that Musk did NOT shut off starlink, but like I said he just refused to turn it on in a new area:
There are no direct hostilities with the USA.
We are experiencing daily cyberattacks from Russia, election interference, and propaganda specifically targeting American’s views across the political spectrum. There is a dictionary definition of “hostility” and what Russia is doing and has been doing for years fits it precisely. You don’t get to make up your own definition any more than you get to make up your own facts.
Lol still going with the completely disproven “election interference” thing are you?
You are trying to use hostility in a completely different meaning to what the Logan Act means.
It’s sad when people believe their own propaganda, make up their own facts and even go so far as to make up definitions to common English words. Dispute and hostility mean what they mean, not what you want them to mean.
And the “completely disproven” election interference? Completely proven.
A tiny portion of just the unredacted findings we know about from the Senate Intelligence Report on Russian Interference in the 2016 Election:
Just keep telling yourself that there was no conspiracy between the Trump campaign and Russia, despite the copious evidence to the contrary. Self-delusion seems to be a maga specialty and you’ve got it down.
I’m not even American you turnip, let alone “MAGA” 😂
What do they call authoritarian followers like you in your country? Sheep?
What do they call authoritarian people like you who want the government to own everything and tell you what to do? Communists?
So the guy who wrote this book that has caused all this controversy came out and clarified that Musk did NOT shut off starlink, but like I said he just refused to turn it on in a new area:
https://x.com/walterisaacson/status/1700342242290901361?s=46&t=Cbb3biYQblpmbWC3J0KfQg
What you have to say now?