• Zagorath
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    6 hours ago

    What shits me is Christians (and Jews and Muslims, but it’s mainly Christians who do this) who just handwave away the problem of evil. Like fine, I can accept that some evils might arise as a result of human decisions and free will. Things like wars and genocides are done by people. It’s difficult to swallow even that much with the idea of a god who supposedly knows all, is capable of doing anything, and is “all good”, but fine, maybe free will ultimately supplants all that.

    But what I absolutely cannot accept is any claim that tries to square the idea of a god with the triple-omnis with the fact that natural disasters happen. That children die of cancer. You try telling the parents of a child slowly dying of a painful incurable disease that someone could fix it if they wanted, and they completely know about it, but that they won’t. And then try telling them that person is “all good”. See how they react.

    I find religious people who believe in the three omnis after having given it any amount of serious consideration to be absolutely disgusting and immoral people.

    • makyo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Yep years ago I was in a bible study, well on my way to being an agnostic already. They were going over a difficult passage and the conclusion was ‘god works in mysterious ways’. Not that I hadn’t heard that nonsense before but for some reason hearing it in that scenario was the last straw and I never went back.

    • underwire212@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 hours ago

      I’m not necessarily disagreeing with you here, but thought I’d provide a counter argument.

      A group of children are dying of a horrible, deadly disease that can only be cured with the bark from a specific tree. So we go into the forest and chop this tree down to save the children from an excruciating disease.

      A squirrel had built its entire home in that tree. That tree was everything to the squirrel. Now the squirrel has nothing and will suffer because we chopped down its home.

      How do we explain this to the squirrel? Well, we can’t. No matter how hard we try, we can’t explain why we needed to destroy its home. The squirrel is physically incapable of understanding.

      Playing devils advocate here, perhaps the reason for the need for human suffering is so beyond our understanding and comprehension that we are just physically incapable of understanding. Maybe we’re just squirrels, and human suffering needs to happen for some greater purpose unbeknownst to us.

      • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        9 minutes ago

        We’re talking about the Abrahamic trio, so God is supposed to be all powerful. That means there is nothing beyond his power. There is no “can only” or “can’t” or “incapable” for him. He can have His cure and save the tree too, He doesn’t have to choose. Your example only works if God is limited in some capacity, and has to make trade offs that we can’t understand.

      • makyo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        That is an interesting thought experiment in general but I don’t think it really squares with Christian theology and the central role humanity has in it.

      • bramkaandorp@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        That argument lands you in the “we can’t know which religion is true” category, because if we can’t know the plans of god, we also can’t know which god is real.

        So, while it absolves the believer from having to answer the problem of evil, it simultaneously robs them of any certainty about the truth of their religion.

        But only if they think about it.

    • geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Any “evil” suffered in current life will be compensated with reward in afterlife.

      The concept tends to fall apart with modern Christianity where everyone just goes to heaven and hell is written out.

      • HiddenLayer555@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 hour ago

        The concept tends to fall apart with modern Christianity where everyone just goes to heaven and hell is written out.

        Huh? From what I can tell Christians are more fixated on hell than ever now. Listen to them talk about gay/trans people, Palestinians, women who get abortions, or literally anyone who isn’t Christian, and it’s clear that they’re really excited about the idea that their god will torture those people for all eternity while they get to watch from heaven. You’ll even get catholics and protestants both thinking they’re the only ones going to heaven and the “wrong” kind of Christian goes to hell because of technicalities like whether you go to confession or not or whether praying to Mary is idolatry. Some outright say that it’s okay to kill gay/trans people, Palestinians, etc, because they’re damned anyway and god doesn’t give a shit about them.