• Zagorath
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Does this even meet the criteria for “a shape”? I’d have thought you need to be able to travel from any point within the shape to any other point, without crossing a line.

    • saltesc@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      40
      ·
      edit-2
      6 hours ago

      The part showing the angle is not part of it. They should’ve made it a dotted line or something.

      Though, two of the 90° angles are.actually 270.

    • lunarul@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 hours ago

      That sounds like the definition for convex shape, not the general definition for a shape

      • Zagorath
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        51 minutes ago

        You’re the second person to have made that suggestion to me, but no.

    • Skua@kbin.earth
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 hours ago

      The classic cartoon star shape isn’t a shape with that rule. Same wth a crescent

      • Zagorath
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        60 minutes ago

        Huh? Of course it is. A star is, so long as you don’t draw it out of two interlocking triangles, or construct it from 5 straight lines, and leave the internal parts of those lines intact. A crescent just…is. Unless you’re trying to claim the stars that sometimes appear with a crescent (e.g. on some Islamic country’s flags) are a part of the crescent itself.

    • skulblaka@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Depends how you define a shape. I don’t think it’s a polygon because it doesn’t have straight lines. Technically a circle also isn’t a polygon by the same rules, but circles have their own special little clubhouse. Sure is a shape though. I think this… thing is also a shape. Just not a useful one.

      • Zagorath
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        47 minutes ago

        As it was presented in the OP, I don’t think it is a shape. If I get two squares and stick them next to each other so one side of each is touching, have I suddenly got one rectangle? Or do I still have two squares with a border between them?

        Someone else posted an amended version with the internal lines removed. The equivalent of taking those two squares and removing the border between them, so you would have just one rectangle.

      • Zagorath
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        53 minutes ago

        Uhh, no. A crescent is a classic concave shape, but you can travel from any point to any other in a crescent without crossing a line, because it’s a single enclosed shape.

        • davidagain@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 minutes ago

          A crescent isn’t a convex shape though, and ironically you left out the word ‘straight’ in your rule about convex.