• Ilandar
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    11 days ago

    deleted by creator

    • snooggums@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      3 months ago

      The point of the article isn’t that AI is outright useless as a coding tool but that it lulls programmers into a false sense of security regarding the quality and security of their code.

      Lulling them into a false sense of security is half of what makes it useless. The fact that it makes shitty code is the other half.

      • cheddar@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        3 months ago

        But the job of a software developer is not to write good code, it is to deliver features. People have been writing bad code without any AI for decades. Businesses often prioritize speed over quality, rewarding teams that deliver features quicker.

        • synae[he/him]@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          3 months ago

          A computer lets you make more mistakes faster than any other invention with the possible exceptions of handguns and Tequila.

          Now Even Faster™ with no exceptions thanks to “AI”

      • Suzune@ani.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        3 months ago

        Devs care to debug code only if they believe in its quality. Otherwise they write the code again from scratch. This is also cheaper than debugging.

        • melroy@kbin.melroy.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 months ago

          I dare to say it: 70% of the devs are not quality focused to start with. They are already happy if something, somewhat, sort of, works. And then not even ship a unit test with it.