What filesystem is currently best for a single nvme drive with regard to performance read/write as well as stability/no file loss? ext4 seems very old, btrfs is used by RHEL, ZFS seems to be quite good… what do people tend to use nowadays? What is an arch users go-to filesystem?

  • root
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Hi all. Apologies to hijack this thread. Figured it should be OK since it’s also on the topic of file systems.

    Long story short, I need to reinstall Nobara OS and I plan to install Nobara on my smaller SSD drive with btrfs and set my /home folder to my larger nvme. I’m thinking of using ext4 for my /home and have snapshots of the main system stored on the nvme. Looking for a sanity check to see if this is OK or if I should be doing things differently. Thanks.

      • root
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        On the contrary, my intention is to make snapshots of the OS (btrfs) and my idea is to store the snapshots on the /home nvme drive (ext4).

        I don’t know if that’s the standard practice or if I’m over complicating things. My SSD is only 240Gb (I think) while my nvme is a 1Tb drive, thus the intention to store snapshots on the nvme. Maybe the 240Gb is sufficient for say a month’s worth of snapshots plus the OS?

        • Krik@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          It’s more important to backup your /home than /. /home is where you store your crucial files.

          • root
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Yes, that’s true. Then again, I’m mainly using my PC for gaming and most of what will be in /home will be game installs. I have my photos and music backups in a separate HDD.

            I think at the end of the day, what I’m trying to achieve with the btrfs snapshots is to be able to roll back my OS in case a system update goes wrong, or I did something I shouldn’t have. :p

        • rocketeer8015@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          No, that’s a very bad idea. BTRFS has deduplication, without that the snapshots would take up way to much space. Also it’s too many writes since ext4 doesn’t use cow and would have to do distinct writes for every snapshot.

          The 240 gb are plenty for a root system without /home and years worth of snapshots on a btrfs volume, only the changes take up space so the amount of snapshots hardly matters.

          For /home either ext4, xfs or btrfs is fine. Personally I only use a single btrfs volume and put certain folders in their own subvolumes so they can have different settings for snapshots(no snapshots for /home, tmp and cache folders).

          • root
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Noted. Thanks for your clear response. I’ll just keep it simple have the OS snapshots on the same partition.