• GnuLinuxDude@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        5 months ago

        Whenever I encounter a project that is not hosted on GitHub, such as https://codeberg.org/dnkl/foot I get totally delighted because navigating and browsing it actually works.

        In GitHub if I am browsing the source code I now have to open it in a raw page without highlighting, because GitHub’s features absolutely gunk it up. I have no intention of ever putting a new project on GitHub again. Bad user experience, untrustworthy leadership, and bad values (I.e. Silicon Valley ones)

    • steeznson@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      5 months ago

      lol we used to call it Buttbucket at my old work where we used it. Should be a relatively easy product to deliver but Atlassian just couldn’t keep it up and bug free

      • EnderMB@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 months ago

        Atlassian is one of those companies that I equally laugh at, love, and hate.

        They’re in so many markets in software and project management, and have so many large clients that pay for Confluence, Jira, BitBucket, etc. Despite this, people almost universally despise their products, with bugs being left open for years, features blissfully ignored, etc.

        I often imagine what it would be like to work for Atlassian, and what “that” code based must look like. Working there must be fun as hell given the impact and breadth of opportunities, equally frustrating if you dogfood your own products, and infuriating given just how much stuff must be utter shit under the hood.

      • DavidDoesLemmy
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 months ago

        I meant if they think GitHub feels like legacy software, they should try Bitbucket. That’s real legacy software.