• Flaky@iusearchlinux.fyi
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    6 months ago

    I’m skeptical on whether this will be a hit with the audience, but at least they’re releasing something I guess. I remember when Microsoft announced HoloLens, which then fizzled out.

  • alecto@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    6 months ago

    I’m pretty excited to see unfiltered reviews of this thing. It will be really interesting to see what apps get released and how people actually end up using it.

  • Fades@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    6 months ago

    I can’t afford it but I am so excited for it to hit the market and hopefully spur competition and usher in more innovation and lower price options.

    The tech looks really promising

  • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    12
    ·
    6 months ago

    There is too much wasted wealth in this world. An AR headset is a great idea. Not at that price. Anyone who is spending that much on a first-generation AR device is too rich.

    • thehatfox@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      6 months ago

      It’s a big ask for an unproven platform. But then the same could be said for the original Mac, which launched in 1984 at $2500, which would be $7000+ today.

      I suppose the question is will Vision Pro be the next Mac or the next Lisa.

    • Petter1@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      I think it’s that expensive, because it is really hard to mass produce and so they want to reduce number of sales needed while still get the project costs back. If there one thing that apple has mastered, it is the calculation of expected number of sales depending on price. They will adjust margin accordingly and will never gift you anything. That is why the price is so high, they know there will be few buyer, but those who buy whatever they ask.

    • garretble@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      6 months ago

      And also just 256GB of storage at that price.

      They want you flying on a plane watching a bunch of movies or playing a bunch of games and give you 256GB.

  • RotaryKeyboard@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    Readers will be available for $99

    Has anyone here used a different VR headeset who also needs reading glasses? I use readers (I had laser eye surgery, which made me need reading glasses much earlier than usual). I tried the Meta Quest 3 over the holidays and was surprised to discover that I didn’t need reading glasses to see things “up close.”

    • FurtiveFugitive@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      I would argue there’s a lot of cool, new, tech in this headset to justify some of the price premium. Not $3500 but certainly some of it.

      The most ridiculous Apple tax is still either with the$1000 pro stand for the monitor. Or the Apple Mac Pro wheels at $700.