• Generative
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    88
    ·
    1 year ago

    It’s essentially a defederated Mastodon instance. Quite impressive that it can it lose 75 million.

    • db2@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      42
      ·
      1 year ago

      That’s the one thing he’s good at, losing other peoples money.

    • 14th_cylon@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      1 year ago

      it might very well be a way to steal these 75m from someone… probably from some morons contributing to his fight to make america great again or something. he is a fraudster after all and it would make total sense.

  • Excrubulent@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    72
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    73 million is so much money I wouldn’t know what to do with it in my entire lifetime.

    Its ~0.3% of the ~20 billion twitter has lost.

    Rich people live in a different universe.

      • _dev_null@lemmy.zxcvn.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        21
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’d disappear into the hedges and nobody would ever know my name.

        Fuck that whole ego stroking “hey I’ve got to start a space tourist business to sell rides to space for other rich narcissist assholes”.

        Nope, I’d disappear onto my own island or huge land reserve, and have an army of accountants and lawyers to ensure I remain anonymous to the larger public.

    • dependencyinjection@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      They’re flawed people.

      I would stop at £1M. I’m not going to earn more than that before I die. But free time is far more valuable.

      Everybody has different goals, but honestly does anybody even need to pass £10M. Broken hoarders is what they are.

  • AnAngryAlpaca@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    60
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Can someone explain how this website lost millions? Given that this size was not that big, I fail to see how it could cost this much in admin and Server cost. Even some better known commercial shops will hardly hit 5digits in monthly server costs, plus salaries for 1-3 admins and support staff, and maybe advertising costs.

    37million sounds like something they pulled out of thin air, maybe for some bookkeeping fraud or tax write off…

    • ladicius@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      28
      ·
      1 year ago

      Some people gut very lucrative contracts out of it. Some influential public person endorsing this shit heavily? Pay him big money. Really big money. The biggest money ever seen.

    • anlumo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Especially since they’re just using existing software, they’re not even implementing their own…

    • Chaotic Entropy@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      The classic Trump way, receive investment money and then pay yourself that investment money and more. Take out loans in the company’s name and eventually asset strip it to pay yourself again.

  • JTskulk@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’ve sat for a while meditating on this, and now I come here to share the fruits of my mental labor. The comment I’ve been working on for hours is: lol

  • Jimmycrackcrack@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    1 year ago

    Was it meant to make money? I mean, I think it’s just basically like old fashioned campaigning materials and propaganda, it’s just taking on the new interactive dimensions of social media and the perpetual campaigning of modern politics that Trump particularly is known for. Really it’s “profit” would be measured in outcomes rather than dollars, just as ad campaigns track numbers.

  • 👁️👄👁️@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    1 year ago

    Wtf did that money even get spent on? They just used mastodon code, so they needed like one or two coders. Traffic was shit so it can’t be that much for hosting.

    • Joker@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      $23M of the loss is from the first half of this year. There was a $10M regulatory settlement and another $11M spent on “legal investigations”, which covers the bulk of that. I don’t have the time nor the inclination to really dig into it, but you can look at the filing here: https://www.sec.gov/ix?doc=/Archives/edgar/data/0001849635/000119312523276045/d408563ds4a.htm

      They lost $50M last year. I haven’t looked at that filing so I don’t have a clue what they spent that on besides $5M on “legal investigations” in the first half.

      This company is a total scam. It’s basically a slush fund for Trump. What would probably be more of a bombshell than the spending is where the money is coming from. It’s all but guaranteed that it’s primarily foreign money. Probably also some rich MAGA wackadoos buying influence.

  • Gazumi@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    1 year ago

    Their acounts going from the green, heading towards the red. Currently mired with the orange.

  • Alien Nathan Edward@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    eh, the next filing will show that it made $200 billion. The one after that will insist that it never existed in the first place.

  • Decentralizr@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Don’t care about him so I didn’t even bother… but congrats to him! As elons dead bird side lost way more haha

  • Geobloke@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Seems like a low cost way to lock people into your viewpoint. Way cheaper than traditional advertising