Microblogging platform apparently fastest-downloaded ever, with Elon Musk threatening to sue over ‘copycat’ app

  • Candelestine@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    54
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    This is fine.

    Let him break Elon’s market lock, we’re probably too techy to do it ourselves. Once the market is split between the two of them, it reduces the core value of twitter, which partly depends on population.

    That creates a better opportunity for us, it’ll be easier to pull from two smaller services than one larger one. Let’s just make sure we don’t get lost and forgotten, so keep talking about our “new idea” from time to time. Places asides here. irl is ideal.

  • _sideffect@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Intentional sign ups or forced/transferred sign ups is a question I’d like answered

    • Monomate@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      It really depends if they’re pushing it through Instagram app, which given the numbers it’s likely.

      Except for the vocal minority, most people don’t really care about Musk to give a damn and move from Twitter to Threads.

  • Barbarian@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    The real question will be how many actually stick around. It’s pretty trivial to make an account and poke around: it’s a different thing entirely to stick around as an active user.

    • ccunning@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      Especially when creating the account is a one way street that can’t be undone without deleting your Instagram account.

      • crowsby@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        I believe that’s a bit of a misleading meme that’s making the rounds. You can deactivate it, which is functionally the same, and they haven’t yet rolled out the feature to delete it because they rushed this thing to market to take advantage of Twitter’s dumpster fire.

        I also might be slow here, but I struggle to understand why this is a big deal. There are countless reasons why I would have reservations with Meta, but aww shit I can only deactivate not delete the Threads account associated with my source Instagram account seems like a weirdly esoteric hill to die on.

  • S_204@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    1 year ago

    I signed up, checked it out then deleted the app. No interest. When they decouple from ig, I’ll delete the account.

    • ccunning@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      I just don’t understand why people would want a timeline they don’t control.

      The few minutes I spent checking out Threads just felt like I was being subjected to the advertisement and braaaaaanding version of the Ludovico Technique

      • S_204@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        1 year ago

        It seemed very clear that the entire experience was set up to manipulate you into seeing what they want you to see rather than what you want to curate for yourself.

        I really don’t have an interest in that sort of manipulation…

  • silverbax@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    I guess by Elon’s logic, Ford and GM could sue him since they created EVs before Tesla did.

  • Meow.tar.gz@lemmy.goblackcat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    That’s 70m people oblivious (or cognitively dissonant) to Meta’s very well documented past transgressions and abuse and exploitation of people’s data. That’s really and truly a shame. The neoliberals are just going to move from one platform to another.

    • Kerfuffle@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      That’s 70m people oblivious (or cognitively dissonant) to Meta’s very well documented past transgressions and abuse and exploitation of people’s data.

      It’s probably mainly people that are already on Twitter and/or Facebook so they’re not really giving up anything new. To be honest, at this point I’d probably be more willing to trust Zuck with data. At least robots are relatively predictable, Musk seems unhinged.

      The neoliberals are just going to move from one platform to another.

      Huh?

  • UnanimousStargazer@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    14
    ·
    1 year ago

    Apparently, lemmy.ml already blocked Threads before Threads started using ActivityPub.

    Personally speaking, I don’t like it if administrators start deciding for all users on their server what they can and cannot see (although they obviously have the right to do so).

    If I want to follow a community or user in Threads, why should an administrator of a Lemmy server be able to prevent me from doing that? It also sounds rather silly, as it’s terribly easy to create multiple accounts on various Lemmy servers and read Threads posts that way.