The total combat losses of the enemy from 24.02.22 to 04.07.23 were approximately:

  • personnel - about 231030 (+770) people were liquidated,
  • tanks - 4059 (+2) units
  • APVs - 7908 (+9) units
  • artillery systems - 4252 (+32) units,
  • MLRS - 647 (+6) units,
  • air defense systems / Anti-aircraft warfare systems - 394 (+3) units
  • aircraft - 315 (+0) units
  • helicopters - 309 (+0) units,
  • UAV operational-tactical level - 3602 (+29),
  • cruise missiles - 1264 (+0),
  • ships / boats / warships / boats - 18 (+0) units,
  • vehicles and fuel tanks - 6843 (+9) units,
  • special equipment - 590 (+0).
  • EvilCartyen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 year ago

    Still lots of artillery being hit, seems they’re still clearing the way for the main phase of the counteroffensive. I wonder if we’ll see a breakthrough at any point, like in Kharkiv, or if that was a lucky punch.

  • peereboominc@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    That is brutal. 231 thousand Russian humans being killed for a dumb war just to try and grab some land.

      • Jives@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        It absolutely does include wounded. Ukraine keeps their wording vague, perhaps on purpose, but there’s no way their estimate of KIA is 4-5x higher than any credible western estimate.

        It’s still an absurd number of casualties, and it’s absurd that Russian citizens don’t seem to care at all.

    • Nukemin Herttua@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      More like trying to stay in power (and alive) no matter what. Totally useless war, but then again, most of them are…

      • Uniquitous@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        As I understand their war aims, they need this particular land because without it they lose access to the Black Sea, which severely curtails their access to the Atlantic. Their other ports are in the North Atlantic and tend to be frozen over and unusable during the winter. If they lose Sevastopol, they’re greatly reduced as an Atlantic power.

        • Haakon@lemmy.sdfeu.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          They could realistically have kept Sevastopol and the rest of Crimea if they just hadn’t invaded the rest of Ukraine; now it’s all at stake.

          But even so, if they lose Sevastopol, there are other Russian ports along the Black Sea, notably Novorossiysk. While that’s much less strategically located, and costly upgrades would be required to function as a marine base, it’s not strictly true that they would lose access to the Black Sea altogether.

          Apologies in advance if this is hopelessly armchair, happy to have my amateur observations nuanced.