That’s not where the girl’s eyes are.
And thus the first sentient AI was discovered
Kachow
⚡
It just like me frfr
Hey lady, my eyes are up here.
They should be keeping their eyes on the road if they are driving lol
That’s just bad driving advice. You should be aware of your surroundings when operating a vehicle.
It was a dad joke.
One step closer to Thomas the Tank engine.
Tommy the car literally can’t even with your shit anymore Stacy.
“People don’t trust autonomous vehicles for safety, security and privacy concerns, so instead of fixing these issues, let’s put some googly eyes on them!” galaxy brain explodes
…seriously tho, which kind of genius exec thought that this was a good idea? Do they think the Uncanny Valley is a spa resort or whatever?
It looks like a sentient vehicle from some 90s/2000s TV show for little children.
The last fucking thing i need before I’m mowed down by the worst version of nightrider is Chuggington eyes.
It might work better if the car’s “face” was cuter. I mean, imagine if it looked like this when the car “noticed” you:
I would prefer a future where I don’t have to see weebs sexually harassing underaged cars, tyvm.
Imagine all the bro fights.
But babe the car was making eyes at you!
Ugh, fuck that. As if I need more reasons to never leave the house.
The car looks like it just got home from an exhausting workday
That would be worse. Anime stylized faces do not work in the 3d space. I’d imagine we’d see a new trend of fancy molded art to match each car’s look and
personality…Ah, who am I kidding? Some exec will just put fucking smileys on the car.
What if it’s a crosswalk with a bunch of people crossing at the same time? Which person would it make eye contact with? Would it rapidly change eye contact with a bunch of people?
deleted by creator
I would rather enjoy Hermaeus Mora showing up at a crosswalk.
If you’re watching a crosswalk with a bunch of people crossing at the same time, who do you look at, hmm?
I just use a value ranking system and rapidly sort variables until I reach the highest possible value.
Women>Men
Pop colors > blending (red is greater than brown, etc.)
Interesting features > bland (So a dude with a scar registers higher than a dude without)
Anomalies > expecteds (a top hat is more interesting than a ball cap)
There’s probably some other minor variations that account for my choices. Thinking about it, the preference for women may be due to them having more eye-catching variables than men in most cases, especially with regards to color and accessories.
Forgot about this comment and came back to a paragraph long comment where the line “Women>Men” popped out to me. My first thought was “Oh no, what political thing did I comment on this time?”
Anyways, thanks for the tip. Let’s make the automated vehicles prioritize staring at women and anyone who dares to stand out.
I imagine people’s eyes flick around taking in everything. Which is normal for a human, super weird for anything mechanical.
The weirdest mfr
It uses the same priorities as when it’s deciding who to save and who to run down in an unavoidable collision. As to how it determines that, what do you think all those trolley problem memes were for?
So it’s gonna multitrack drift the eyes?
What the actual fuck is that teletubbies lookin ass abomination
if it were me
For some reason I kind of love it!
Same. At least I know it detected me.
If I’m walking or biking in front of a car stopped at an intersection it’s nice to have confirmation that the driver has seen me and isn’t going to press on the gas the moment I’m in front of the vehicle because they didn’t realize I was there, so a robotic equivalent of this would be actually useful.
Can we just not? Please?
