• MoreFPSmorebetter@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    242
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    5 days ago

    What a great fucking idea. Let’s take a physical limited resource mineral and trade it for an untraceable and unregulated made up currency.

    Holy shit I’m gonna have a stroke.

    • SlopppyEngineer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      120
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      5 days ago

      If you want to reward your high profile friends so they can cash out with tangible assets before the whole currency or economy crashes, this is how you would do things.

      • Fedizen@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        62
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        5 days ago

        Step 1: Put everything in crypto

        Step 2: Economy crashes, society no longer has power or running water.

        Step 3: Try to sell crypto but for some reason computer won’t turn on.

        • SlopppyEngineer@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          34
          ·
          5 days ago

          Step 4: the rich that bought the gold uses it to privatize all water and power to get it working again, now becomes even more rich.

        • kibiz0r@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          4 days ago

          Don’t worry, if you can’t afford a computer to manage your crypto, your employer can manage it for you (for a fee)

    • NaibofTabr@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      64
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      5 days ago

      So couple things:

      1. Bitcoin (and other cryptocurrencies) are certainly not untraceable. Public ledger means that all the transactions are publicly visible - if you can associate a wallet to a person or organization then you know where the money went, and there are businesses that specifically do that kind of research. Every single transaction ever is part of the blockchain record. Cryptocurrency is a terrible way to make a clandestine purchase.
      2. All currencies are made up (I know, real imfourteenandthisisdeep energy, but still technicallythetruth).

      *Edit - A silly caveat to this is that if the US government starts regularly transacting in Bitcoin, it would be very easy to audit… using blockchain means there’s a built-in transaction record… anybody with a little bit of experience in reading the ledger could just track everything.

      Other than that you’re absolutely right.

      1. Cryptocurrencies are still largely unregulated, and the crypto market has attracted exactly the kind of people you would expect to be most interested in unregulated financial transactions - scammers, thieves, con men, ransomware gangs, money launderers, and anyone who wants buy or sell CSAM, narcotics, weapons, DDOS-as-a-Service, and North Korea’s government funding crew. The crypto market is absolutely chock-full of criminal activity, so it’s entirely reasonable to assume that anyone who wants to participate in that market wants to participate in the crime.
      2. As you said, trading physical gold for digital currency is a stupid idea. It’s also uneccessary, because the FBI is already sitting on a collection of cryptocurrencies that have been confiscated through criminal investigations, including large amounts of Bitcoin. It is technically illegal right now for the US government to do anything with that, but that could be changed with a law. There’s nowhere else for that cryptocurrency to go anyway.

      It seems likely to me that a play to distribute gold from the reserve is about having an excuse to open it and take gold out, and disappear some of it in the process. It’s a cover for a plan to rob the US.

    • datendefekt@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      5 days ago

      Bitcoin absolutely is traceable. Addresses might not be clear names, but all transactions are public. Which makes me wonder why the government wants to use Bitcoin.

      • Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        17
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 days ago

        Because the crypto currency industry spent an absolutely ungodly amount of money helping Trump get elected.

        The government buying and holding Bitcoin pumps up the price of Bitcoin. This is just the other side of the quid pro quo. They got him elected, now he has to make them richer.

      • futatorius@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 days ago

        That’s correct. Bitcoin is pseudonymous, not anonymous. If you can find the identity of a party to any bitcoin transaction, you then can know about every transaction they ever made with that ID.

        Which makes me wonder why the government wants to use Bitcoin.

        Because Trump is a fucking imbecile, but thinks there’s an opportunity for a scam.

    • dan@upvote.au
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      5 days ago

      untraceable

      Literally every transaction is stored in a public ledger that anyone can read. That’s not exactly untraceable. Eventually someone will convert the Bitcoin to regular currency, which then links the transaction chain to the real world. Transactions can be clustered based on accounts at exchanges, and often patterns emerge once you do this. This is how some ransomware groups are uncovered.

    • explodicle@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      4 days ago

      limited resource

      Gold can be created in supernovae and then found in asteroids.

      There will only be 21 million bitcoins ever.

    • Scipitie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      11
      ·
      4 days ago

      If your problem with Bitcoin is that it’s a made up currency then I have vers bad news about gold for you.

      And all other currencies.

      That plan is ludicrous for a lot of reasons but you chose to mention the only two that are not it

  • Wilco@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    70
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    4 days ago

    This reality is so fucking stupid. Let’s sell something of value to buy something that is only valuable if someone really wants it bad enough.

    • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      30
      arrow-down
      13
      ·
      4 days ago

      To be fair, gold is the same. It’s just more well established since it’s been around much longer.

      Not defending this shit, just pointing out that gold is also only worth what people are willing to pay for it. That’s kind of how all markets work.

      • vxx@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        44
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        4 days ago

        Gold works without energy. It doesnt oxidise or decay as other materials

      • shawn1122@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        edit-2
        4 days ago

        The difference is gold has carried high monetary value among human societies for nearly 3000 years while Bitcoin is a non tangible digital asset that’s existed for less than two decades and remains incredibly volatile.

        This comes across as another Trump scam. He’s going to bankrupt the American government by siphoning public money to himself and other private entities and the American people are going to be stuck hodling the bag.

        • Wahots@pawb.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          4 days ago

          That, and gold actually has properties that make it useful, like not oxidizing and being a good conductor. It still has value even if it was otherwise worthless as a currency

          • explodicle@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            4 days ago

            If bitcoin was otherwise worthless as a currency, then it would still be useful for secure time stamps.

    • KneeTitts@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      Well no its actually a perfect method of looting the treasury and handing all the country’s future wealth to the billionaires now, making them trillionaires, and all in a way thats essentially impossible to track…

  • HubertManne@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    4 days ago

    Now ladies and gentlemen I will astound you with demonstration of my mighty mystical methods. Right before your very eyes I will make this gold disappear. Not just to your eyes, not just to thin air, but such that it will only be a logical concept of worth. One, two, three…

  • Sludgehammer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    58
    ·
    edit-2
    5 days ago

    So… I’m guessing the plebs get the cryptocurrencies. Which are backed by stablecoins… which are backed by tech grifters saying “I can cover it bro, trust me”.

    Meanwhile the elites will take all that worthless gold and dispose of it for us.

    • pixxelkick@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      26
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      5 days ago

      Bitcoin is backed by the price of coal.

      For all intents and purposes, bitcoin is effectively minted coal.

      • futatorius@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        22
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        5 days ago

        Bitcoin doesn’t relate to coal that’s still unburnt. It’s more a certificate confirming a quantum of environmental destruction.

        • pixxelkick@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          4 days ago

          That’s probably a better way to put it yeah.

          And as fucked as it is, it is a fact that this does hold value and is backed by it.

          It’s just a pretty shit thing to be backed by ethically.

          But nonetheless, there is value in bitcoin, it’s just best we don’t encourage further investment in such a thing.

        • pixxelkick@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          4 days ago

          Yep. It’s unethical but nonetheless makes the coin actually have tangible holdings, because it’s actually impacting the real world.

      • HubertManne@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        4 days ago

        yes but remember it artifically inflates so the amount of coal its worth is always going higher. You need way more coal to make one down than you did ten years ago.

  • middlemanSI@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    56
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 days ago

    Mr. Art of the deal-do is robbing you blind. No matter how this ends, he and felon will have stashed piles of you cash

    • gramie@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      The only real question is whether he is doing this to enrich himself, or because Putin told him to do it.

  • CobraChicken3000@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    48
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 days ago

    Well there it is. For anyone who believed that they were simply going to create a reserve to store already existing cryptocurrencies - that were confiscated by the federal agencies - and not spend federal dollars to bolster or hype up cryptocurrencies that are connected to the people in the administration, y’all are idiots.

    • pulsewidth@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 days ago

      I mean even that original plan would be fairly stupid. Law enforcement agencies seem to operate just fine with the current reserve of forfeited cryptocoins - I didn’t read anywhere of the FBI/CIA/etc crying out for a central bank style ‘strategic reserve’ managed by the FRB to add more layers of bureaucracy.

      The only place I can find in news cycles saying it’s a great idea is a think tank entitled the Bitcoin Policy Institute who put out a report in late 2024 entitled “The case for Bitcoin as a reserve asset”. Plus all the usual crypto bros begging for it to pump their positions. Gosh, I wonder if these parties may be biased.

  • sp3ctr4l@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    Copying my comment from this same story, other thread on another instance/community:

    These actual mouth breathing morons have no idea what they are even attempting to describe.

    https://www.federalreserve.gov/faqs/does-the-federal-reserve-own-or-hold-gold.htm

    https://wikipedia.org/wiki/Gold_certificate_(United_States)

    The Federal Reserve doesn’t actually own, nor physically possess, any physical gold, that they could just sell off or speculate with.

    When FDR outlawed gold private ownership in 1934, all physical gold was handed over to the US Treasury, and the Federal Reserve (and other banks) were given gold certificates, valued at $42.22… per ounce… a set value that hasn’t changed, and is used for the Fed’s modest valuation of its previously held gold reserves… which are utterly insignificant and dwarfed by the other assets it holds.

    (This isn’t super current, but it gives you an idea. Light blue is gold certificates. Its a one pixel thin line at the bottom. The overall balance is even more huge than this now after Covid, and Gold Certs, even if they were revalued from $42.2222 to the current market rate, would basically be small, it would go from about 10 billion to 750 billion, when the Fed’s current total assets are about 7 trillion)

    About 5% of the US Treasury’s gold is held at the New York Fed, but the Fed doesn’t own it, it’s just there because there is a vault there. The rest of the US’s gold is physically held at Treasury operated locations.

    What the Fed does own are Gold Certificates, back from 1934, which are still valued at the old $42.2222 price, in terms of the Fed calculating its own balance sheet.

    To… have the US gov… order the Fed to sell off its gold certificates… that’s not a thing the US gov can actually legally do, not without asserting total direct control over the Fed, and thus basically instantly making its existence pointless…

    Again, to repeat, the US government cannot legally command the Fed to sell off its gold certificates, the Fed cannot legally sell its gold certificates, nor could said certificates be legally exchanged for actual physical gold from the US Treasury.

    This would be approximately analagous to the US government ordering a corporation to sell off its own capital assets and then just sending the money from that sale to a government account.

    It is expropriation.

    For this to be any kind of legal, they’d have to repeal or greatly amend … at least the laws that established the Federal Reserve, and the Gold Reserve Act, likely many more… or basically do a whole bunch of rat fuckery to get their own people in positions on various Fed Reserve boards, and possibly prevent other people on Fed Reserve boards from actually voting on motions.

    This would amount to basically performing a coup on the US’s central banking system, and putting total control of the monetary system within the Treasury.

    This would upend the century old bedrock of the US’s financial system.

    Now, I am no full, uncritical advocate of the Federal Reserve system in its current form… but this is what it is, a complete usurpation of the US’s existing monetary system, which would then be put in charge of the astoundingly incompetent current administration.

    This is how you get hyperinflation.

    This is quite literally fucking with the money at its most fundamental level.

    This is how you speed run destroying the USD as the world reserve currency.

    tldr;

    This isn’t only stupid in the sense of ‘sell gold to buy bitcoin’ is a dubious investment strategy, it is particularly stupid in that if the actual pursued strategy is ‘force the Fed to sell its gold certificates’…

    (to who? its not legal for any private entity to ‘purchase’ them at the market rate for gold, nor is it legal for said hypothetical purchaser, not even the Fed, to actually redeem them for physical gold, nor is it even legal for the Fed to sell them even of its own accord!)

    … then that method blows up the entire concept of a legally defined, semi-independent Federal Reserve, and that then blows up the entire basis of the US monetary system.

  • tal@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    4 days ago

    What Happened: Bo Hines, the executive director of the President’s Council of Advisers on Digital Assets, suggested in an interview that the U.S. could capitalize on the gains from its gold holdings to purchase more Bitcoin.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bo_Hines

    Robert “Bo” Hines (born August 29, 1995) is an American former college football player from North Carolina. He played college football for the NC State Wolfpack and Yale Bulldogs. In 2022, he was the Republican nominee in North Carolina’s 13th congressional district.

    Call me a traditionalist, but it seems to me that if you’re going to be advising the President on digital assets, it’d be nice to have an economics background.

    • Billiam@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      4 days ago

      Call me a traditionalist, but it seems to me that if you’re going to be advising the President on digital assets, it’d be nice to have an economics background.

      None of the rest of Trump’s cabinet have any qualifications, so why should this guy?

    • Maggoty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      4 days ago

      Just to add, he is a lawyer. He did politics to law pipeline. And yeah there’s typically no economic requirement to that like there would be with other political science paths.