• Kalcifer@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      19 hours ago

      Err, but each of my comments have been directly addressing things that you’ve stated in this thread, so wouldn’t that logically infer that my comments are related to this thread? Explicitly my logic would be: If comment A directly addresses the content in comment comment B, then A is related to B; each of my comments respectively address the content in each of your comments; therefore, my comments are related to your comments [1]. Would you mind outlining exactly isn’t related to the thread? Perhaps I missed something.

      References
      1. “Modus Ponens”. Wikipedia. Published: 2024-07-07T05:04Z. Accessed: 2024-12-11T02:36Z. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Modus_ponens.
        • §“Explanation”. ¶1.
          1. If P, then Q.
          2. P.
          3. Therefore, Q.
      • Bronzebeard@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Being tangential to the overall topic doesn’t mean you’re addressing the actual main point of this thread