Both KDE and GNOME to offer official distros
www.theregister.com
Leading Linux desktops boldly address the "not enough distros" non-problem
  • johsny@lemmy.worldEnglish
    71·
    8 hours ago

    I thought that is what KDE neon is? Didn’t read the article though.

  • TheGrandNagus@lemmy.worldEnglish
    9·
    9 hours ago

    Honestly, I’m all for it.

    Both the Plasma and Gnome teams have visions for how systems should be when using their DE, but sometimes existing distros don’t go along with that.

    I think it’ll be interesting to see how a Plasma or Gnome distro pans out.

    And if I don’t like it, there’s nothing stopping me from simply continuing to use Fedora, or running something else.

  • adam_y@lemmy.worldEnglish
    34·
    17 hours ago

    The author of this article seems to think that choice and alternatives are a bad thing.

    I’d like to take the opposite position. The more the merrier. Come on in.

    Variety drives open source.

    • haverholm@kbin.earth
      2·
      5 hours ago

      I tend to agree. I like being able to install whatever distro I want and add the DE of my choice, and there is a glut of different combos to choose from.

      However, are KDE and Gnome going to gradually focus on making their respective DEs work on their own branded OS, rather than any old base system? I know that’s a worst case scenario, but putting a lot of added effort into a full OS is a nontrivial investment for a desktop environment. Some mission drift might be expected.

    • CameronDev@programming.dev
      341·
      17 hours ago

      Variety is good to a point. Too many alternatives and all you get is a bunch of under-resourced and unpolished results.

      • adam_y@lemmy.worldEnglish
        4·
        8 hours ago

        I disagree.

        This assumes that progress on one distro doesn’t lead to progress on others.

        • CameronDev@programming.dev
          2·
          7 hours ago

          There is a difference between feature development and distro maintenance/packaging.

          Feature development is done upstream and does flow down to others.

          Distro maintenance and packaging is downstream, and almost never provides value to other distros. It usually doesn’t even provide value to the next release. Distro maintenance is a hard, thankless Sisyphean task.

      • MadhuGururajan@programming.devEnglish
        31·
        12 hours ago

        You think there is a dearth of software engineers out there who can’t spend time on something cool like a linux distro?

        • CameronDev@programming.dev
          81·
          10 hours ago

          Well, yeah. Its pretty well established that there is fairly limited resources in open source. Loads of software engineers, very few contributors.