• unscholarly_source@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    161
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    Now this is exactly the type of professional language I would expect to see, not the off the cuff defensive language Linus unfortunately resorts to in difficult times.

    1. Acknowledgement and recognition of the problem. 2) next steps 3) timeframe (they didn’t give a specific timeframe, but did ask for time, which is ok, since they may not know how long it may take).

    Serious (no jokes like with previous statements), factual, unbiased, no kneejerk emotional outbursts.

    • li10@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      72
      ·
      11 months ago

      Exactly what I was thinking.

      Fanboys were saying “what more do you want from their GN response”, and the answer is this.

      • runjun@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        20
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        Except, a good chunk of comments are complaining because the video has them reading from the teleprompter. So clearly they want perfect off the cuff remarks that also includes actionable items that require team discussion and agreement.

        Just to add my agreement to the Floatplane post. This response to the gross behaviors cited by Madison deserve this action plan and transparency.

  • Xusontha@ls.buckodr.ink
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    58
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    I hope the third party releases their findings, for better or for worse

    Right now all we really have are “he said, she said” and it’s about very serious topics, so I would like to see what actually happened

    To be clear, I’m not saying Madison is lying; what I am saying is I just want the full truth from a 3rd, unbiased party, so I think hiring an external investigator is the right decision here.

    • Hoomod@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      52
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      11 months ago

      Having the owners wife as the head of HR probably doesn’t help with reporting anything

      • unscholarly_source@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        22
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        I thought it was Colton? In the LTT response video with all the company heads, Colton mentioned HR was under him… Maybe it transferred from Yvonne to Colton at some point?

      • webghost0101@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        11 months ago

        She mentioned being told to put your big girl pants on and honestly i can actually hear Yvonne say sm like that.

        Honestly i think Madison spoke from truth but that doesn’t mean everything is toxic. Her perspective is valid and how she felt most important but the actual situations can still include misunderstandings and unclear boundaries between people.

    • Pistcow@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      27
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      11 months ago

      My Corp hired third party investigators. They’ll give you the dirt and suggestions but will not publicly release any of the findings. That’s up to the company that hired them to do and often they bury it or hand wave it away saying the investigation is complete and we have somethings to internalize npah blah blah.

      • runjun@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        11 months ago

        The post literally says they are committed to publishing. I understand everyone’s skepticism of it but at least allow the transgression to happen first.

        • jet@hackertalks.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          11 months ago

          If you listen to the internal discussion meeting, from when that ex-employee left, they indicate that they have disclosure requirements, or more correctly privacy requirements that prevent them from talking about these issues externally. So even a very thorough investigative report will put them in a position where they can’t publish it unredacted, and the redacted version won’t satisfy the public. It’s a catch-22 situation for them. But I’m glad they’re at least going as far down the path as they can. It’ll be impossible to satisfy everyone, and clear the name entirely, or disprove things even. But they’re doing what they can

      • Xusontha@ls.buckodr.ink
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        arrow-down
        16
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        LMG isn’t like a lot of other companies, they’re more open

        Also, hopefully at least some of the leadership would realize the best way to get out of this is by being open about the problems and how you are working on fixing them

        Edit: Of course I’m getting downvoted even though I was right and the CEO said they would publish the findings

        • JGrffn@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          11 months ago

          Bad moment to say anything positive about LTT, even if it’s true😂

          • Xusontha@ls.buckodr.ink
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            11 months ago

            I know… I’m really trying to just be objective, but everyone’s already made up their mind without waiting on the third party investigation or anything

            However, if the allegations are true though then it isn’t true and I was wrong

    • justastranger@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      11 months ago

      Due to the mentioning of emails, there should absolutely be some sort of paper trail that the investigation will hopefully find to corroborate at least some of her claims

      • Xusontha@ls.buckodr.ink
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        I hope any paper/email trails that shed light on this situation are found and we can just get to the bottom of this quickly, so that the right thing can be done. If Linus/others at LMG are scumbags, I hope they get fired immediately and have to pay for what they did. If not, then I just wonder why Madison was saying these things (not saying it did or didn’t happen, just trying to theorize about all possibilities)

  • riodoro1@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    11 months ago

    They went to chat gpt and asked: “You are a chief communications officer for a large corporation who has done something bad to its employees, please write a public response”

    The genericness of it is awful

    • English Mobster@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      11 months ago

      Just put your exact quote into GPT-4, you aren’t wrong:


      Dear [Community/Customers/Employees],

      We are deeply aware of the concerns that have arisen regarding our recent actions towards our employees. I want to express our sincere regret and acknowledge that we have not lived up to the standards we set for ourselves.

      We recognize that our actions have led to disappointment and confusion, and we’re committed to making things right. A comprehensive internal investigation has been initiated, and we are working with all parties involved to understand the full scope of the situation.

      We believe in transparency, trust, and accountability, and will be taking immediate steps to rectify the situation, including providing support to those who have been affected.

      I assure you that we will learn from this incident, make the necessary improvements to our processes, and continue to strive to uphold the values that have defined our company for years.

      Your trust in our company means everything to us, and we are committed to earning it back. We appreciate your patience and understanding as we work through this challenging situation.

      Sincerely,

      [Your Name] Chief Communications Officer [Company Name]