• coyotino [he/him]@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    2 months ago

    Lots of negativity here. I thought the show was good enough to earn some Emmy noms. The acting in particular was pretty outstanding, everything else struck me as “pretty good” but not quite Emmy level. I’m actually surprised that Ella Purnell was not nominated for lead actress, she really brought to life a character that had a lot of levels.

    • Vodulas [they/them]@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      2 months ago

      I am a longtime Fallout fan and I loved the show. They nailed the feel of the games in a different medium, so that should be applauded. Ella Purnell and Walton Goggins were perfect for the roles. I don’t really care about Emmy’s, but fuck the haters

    • PythagreousTitties@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      You need to watch more shows if you think Fallout was worth awards. Like someone else said, it was fun, but it was not that good.

          • Gaywallet (they/it)@beehaw.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            11
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            2 months ago

            Your first sentence was passive aggressive. You suggested that the person is not worthy to judge, based on your own judgement of the show, and you suggested that they don’t have a basis to form a judgement based on their lack of watch history. Here it is, for posterity-

            You need to watch more shows if you think Fallout was worth awards.

            Also, welcome to Beehaw! We tend to be a bit more hands on when it comes to moderation. A reminder to be nice is just a reminder. It’s not a warning. I’m not going to ban you. This is about setting the tone for discussion and helping ensure that posts don’t go off the rails or that fights don’t start. If that’s not your vibe, that’s okay too! You don’t have to participate here 💜

          • ranandtoldthat@beehaw.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            2 months ago

            Tone is tough online. You’re probably trying to be helpful, but some people will read a strongly worded direct suggestion as unfounded criticism. Acknowledging the other opinion as valid before offering the suggestion is one way to soften the tone without massively changing the core of your point.

            • PythagreousTitties@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              2 months ago

              Well, honestly if someone can’t contextualize tone on a forum they shouldn’t be in a position to threaten mod actions. It’s pretty important to be able to read things correctly.

              • jet@hackertalks.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                8
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                2 months ago

                The moderator explained it to you very clearly.

                Your sentence, will not having an outright insult in it, did diminish the other person’s experiences and perspectives.

  • twinnie@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    2 months ago

    It really wasn’t all that good, they just didn’t fuck it up.

    Some of the special effects were pretty ropey and that power armour looked terrible.

    • jet@hackertalks.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      When everybody’s rooting for you, sometimes all you have to do, is not fuck up. It’s amazing how many shows take that as a challenge rather than a gift