• Ephera@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    4 months ago

    My interpretation was that they’re exactly talking about anthropomorphization, that’s what we’re good at. Put googly eyes on a random object and people will immediately ascribe it human properties, even though it’s just three objects in a certain arrangement.

    In the case of LLMs, the googly eyes are our language and the chat interface that it’s displayed in. The anthropomorphization isn’t inherently bad, but it does mean that people subconsciously ascribe human properties, like intelligence, to an object that’s stringing words together in a certain way.

    • A_Very_Big_Fan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      Ah, yeah you’re right. I guess the part I actually disagree with is that it’s the source of the hype, but I misconstrued the point because of the sub this was posted in lol.

      Personally, (before AI pervaded all the spaces it has no business being in) when I first saw things like LLMs and image generators I just thought it was cool that we could make a machine imitate things previously only humans could do. That, and LLMs are generally very impersonal, so I don’t think anthropomorphization is the real reason.