vividspecter@lemm.ee to Melbourne · 1 year agoNimbys v Yimbys: the affluent inner Melbourne suburbs that aren’t pulling their weight on housingwww.theguardian.comexternal-linkmessage-square13linkfedilinkarrow-up122arrow-down14
arrow-up118arrow-down1external-linkNimbys v Yimbys: the affluent inner Melbourne suburbs that aren’t pulling their weight on housingwww.theguardian.comvividspecter@lemm.ee to Melbourne · 1 year agomessage-square13linkfedilink
minus-squareDolphinLundgrinlinkfedilinkarrow-up7arrow-down1·1 year agoAnyone with a tennis court should be forced to subdivide, and get no compensation.
minus-squareNathAlinkfedilinkarrow-up4·1 year agoThat’s a bit rough isn’t it? Why tennis courts specifically and not people with gardens? or Pools? Is it just that anyone who has a tennis court is therefore rich and won’t notice the financial loss?
minus-squareTaleyalinkfedilinkarrow-up6·edit-21 year agoI’ve seen a pool fit in a subdivided lot. Gardens have use. A tennis court is a bullshit vanity.
Anyone with a tennis court should be forced to subdivide, and get no compensation.
That’s a bit rough isn’t it? Why tennis courts specifically and not people with gardens? or Pools? Is it just that anyone who has a tennis court is therefore rich and won’t notice the financial loss?
I’ve seen a pool fit in a subdivided lot. Gardens have use. A tennis court is a bullshit vanity.
Yes.